The usage of dipole-dipole array in Lumpur Sidoarjo (Lusi)

  • Thread starter Thread starter aruhiruna
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The dipole-dipole array has not been effectively utilized for resistivity tomography in the Mud Volcano of Lumpur Sidoarjo (Lusi), Indonesia, due to the site's flat terrain and challenging access. Resistivity methods are better suited for mapping horizontal stratigraphic sequences and identifying faulted boundaries rather than extracting underground structures in this context. The conductive nature of the marine mud, originally volcanic ash, complicates surface measurements, potentially obscuring subsurface features. For effective analysis, deploying seismic geophones around the site is recommended to create a 3D model of the mud flow and its interaction with solid rock layers.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of dipole-dipole array configurations
  • Knowledge of resistivity tomography techniques
  • Familiarity with seismic geophone deployment
  • Basic principles of hydrostatic pressure in geological contexts
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the application of dipole-dipole arrays in geophysical surveys
  • Explore resistivity tomography methods for stratigraphic analysis
  • Learn about seismic data interpretation and 3D modeling techniques
  • Investigate hydrostatic pressure calculations for mud flow containment strategies
USEFUL FOR

Geophysicists, environmental engineers, researchers studying mud volcanoes, and professionals involved in geological survey methodologies will benefit from this discussion.

aruhiruna
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Does anyone know whether the dipole-dipole configuration has been used for extracting resistivity tomography in Mud Volcano of Lumpur Sidoarjo (Lusi) in Sidoarjo, Indonesia?
Does anyone know whether the dipole-dipole configuration has been used for extracting resistivity tomography in Mud Volcano of Lumpur Sidoarjo (Lusi) in Sidoarjo, Indonesia?. If there has already exist, please inform me... Thank you for the help.
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sidoarjo_mud_flow
There may be someone here who knows the answer, but this question is probably better answered by a search of geophysical survey journals.
https://www.agiusa.com/dipole-dipole​-​array​

Since the mud-volcano is very flat, and access is difficult, I doubt it would be possible to extract an underground structure using resistivity methods. Resistivity tomography is more applicable to mapping the depth of horizontal stratigraphic sequences, or to locating discontinuities or faulted boundaries below overburden.

What information do you required?
What might be done if more information was available?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Thank you for the answer. I am beginning to explore the Lusi in Wikipedia. I am especially in need of the information on electrode deployment. Then, I might adapt it to my own tool setting. Thank you
 
I think the mud is probably marine, originally volcanic ash, washed into the sea. That mud will probably be more conductive than the local solid rock layers that cap the mud formations. I think the layer of conductive mud on the surface, will screen or hide what is happening below from your electrodes on the surface.

If I wanted to study the Lusi, I think I would place seismic geophones around the site. It should be possible to correlate and plot the sounds in 3D, giving a model of the mud flow where it meets the solid rock. That will show the depth and diameter of the column of rising mud. How much noise is made at depth?

If a circular wall or coffer dam could be built on the surface, around the mud outflow, as the wall gets higher and the mud deeper, the hydrostatic weight of mud might be sufficient to stop the flow. What was the mud static pressure when it was drilled, and how high would the wall need to be?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
8K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K