The usage of dipole-dipole array in Lumpur Sidoarjo (Lusi)

  • Thread starter Thread starter aruhiruna
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of dipole-dipole resistivity tomography in the context of the Lumpur Sidoarjo mud volcano in Indonesia. Participants explore the feasibility of using this method for geophysical surveys in a challenging environment characterized by mud flows.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the use of dipole-dipole configuration for resistivity tomography in the Lumpur Sidoarjo mud volcano.
  • Another participant suggests that due to the flat terrain and difficult access, resistivity methods may not effectively extract underground structures, noting that resistivity tomography is better suited for mapping horizontal stratigraphic sequences.
  • A participant expresses interest in electrode deployment for their own tool setting, indicating a need for more specific information on the topic.
  • One participant hypothesizes that the mud is likely marine and more conductive than the underlying rock layers, suggesting that this conductivity could obscure deeper geological features from surface measurements.
  • Another participant proposes using seismic geophones to create a 3D model of the mud flow and its interaction with solid rock, raising questions about the noise produced at depth.
  • A suggestion is made regarding the construction of a circular wall or coffer dam to potentially control the mud flow, prompting questions about the static pressure of the mud and the necessary height of such a structure.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effectiveness of resistivity tomography in this context, with some questioning its applicability while others propose alternative methods. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to study the mud volcano.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to the terrain, access challenges, and the nature of the mud, which may affect the effectiveness of various geophysical methods. Specific assumptions about the conductivity of the mud and the geological context are also noted but not fully explored.

aruhiruna
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Does anyone know whether the dipole-dipole configuration has been used for extracting resistivity tomography in Mud Volcano of Lumpur Sidoarjo (Lusi) in Sidoarjo, Indonesia?
Does anyone know whether the dipole-dipole configuration has been used for extracting resistivity tomography in Mud Volcano of Lumpur Sidoarjo (Lusi) in Sidoarjo, Indonesia?. If there has already exist, please inform me... Thank you for the help.
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sidoarjo_mud_flow
There may be someone here who knows the answer, but this question is probably better answered by a search of geophysical survey journals.
https://www.agiusa.com/dipole-dipole​-​array​

Since the mud-volcano is very flat, and access is difficult, I doubt it would be possible to extract an underground structure using resistivity methods. Resistivity tomography is more applicable to mapping the depth of horizontal stratigraphic sequences, or to locating discontinuities or faulted boundaries below overburden.

What information do you required?
What might be done if more information was available?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Thank you for the answer. I am beginning to explore the Lusi in Wikipedia. I am especially in need of the information on electrode deployment. Then, I might adapt it to my own tool setting. Thank you
 
I think the mud is probably marine, originally volcanic ash, washed into the sea. That mud will probably be more conductive than the local solid rock layers that cap the mud formations. I think the layer of conductive mud on the surface, will screen or hide what is happening below from your electrodes on the surface.

If I wanted to study the Lusi, I think I would place seismic geophones around the site. It should be possible to correlate and plot the sounds in 3D, giving a model of the mud flow where it meets the solid rock. That will show the depth and diameter of the column of rising mud. How much noise is made at depth?

If a circular wall or coffer dam could be built on the surface, around the mud outflow, as the wall gets higher and the mud deeper, the hydrostatic weight of mud might be sufficient to stop the flow. What was the mud static pressure when it was drilled, and how high would the wall need to be?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
6K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
8K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K