The Volta Pille - how COULD it work

  • Thread starter Thread starter Drmarshall
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the functioning of the Volta pile and the implications of surface moisture on its voltage generation. It highlights that while Volta's setup theoretically produces 1.2 volts per cell, the presence of water layers could negate this effect, raising questions about the minimum thickness required for an effective electrolyte. Participants debate the role of materials in voltage output, particularly comparing copper/zinc to lead-based cells, and emphasize the importance of understanding Fermi levels and electrochemical reactions. The conversation also touches on the historical context of electrochemistry, referencing Faraday's work and the evolution of knowledge in the field. Overall, the thread underscores the complexity of electrochemical systems and the need for deeper research into their mechanisms.
Drmarshall
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
I am placing my question here as it is electrochemistry

Volta, in his pile, generated voltage and at least a few mA of current

He had 100 copper disks separated from zinc disks by wet blotting-paper

So each gave 1.2 volts and he had lots of volts.

But THINK about this!
ALL surfaces are coated by a monolayer of water!
Especially in UK where I live!

So his battery was cu water zn water cu water zn ...
Total 1.2 -1.2+1.2-1.2 +1.2... = 0 volts.

So how THICK does an electrolyte have to be to be an electrolyte?

And WHY is copper/zinc 1.2 to 1.4 volts and lead/lead peroxide 2 to 2.7 volts
How is it related to the electron fermi levels
Why are the best anodes (like PbO2) semiconductors?

Why is Zn/C 1.4 volts in NH4Cl with MnO2 "depolariser" and
Zn/C in the dichromate cell and Grove cell 2.0 volts.

Why don't they include non-metals in the "Electrochemical Series"?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
All of these are good questions. Sound like you have some research to do.
 
SteamKing said:
All of these are good questions. Sound like you have some research to do.
Funny! I have researched this for seventy years!
 
Dr_Morbius said:
Then you wasted 70 years because you could have found the answer to these basic chemistry questions on Wikipedia in 5 minutes.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volta_pile
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galvanic_cell
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_electrode_potential
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battery_(electricity)

I tried all them
They do not explain how the Fermi levels affect the volts, and only SAY what the volts are - not why. Nor how thick a film has to be to behave as an electrolyte.
 
... you can be forgiven for not going right to wikipedia as it did not exist 70 years ago :)
However - those articles make a very good start. It is a big subject so you would not expect to find everything you are after in just one source. Clearly you need to look up the electrochemistry of the films in question as well.

Aside: in 70 years diligent searching you most likely came across Faraday's work on electrochemistry ... he had a reasonably accessible description from studying Volta's work. geometry of the piles was one of the things he studied - and you'll find treatments in engineering texts to this day.

Keep going - sounds like you have spent 70 years looking in the wrong places.
 
Last edited:
Simon Bridge said:
... you can be forgiven for not going right to wikipedia as it did not exist 70 years ago :)
However - those articles make a very good start. It is a big subject so you would not expect to find everything you are after in just one source. Clearly you need to look up the electrochemistry of the films in question as well.

Aside: in 70 years diligent searching you most likely came across Faraday's work on electrochemistry ... he had a reasonably accessible description from studying Voltair's work. geometry of the piles was one of the things he studied - and you'll find treatments in engineering texts to this day.

Keep going - sounds like you have spent 70 years looking in the wrong places.

Volta, not Voltaire!
 
OK - typo corrected - but comments still stand.
 
How much water is on the surface of those disks depends on several factors like air humidity, temperature, surface structure etc.
But it doesn't matter. If a copper and zinc disk are touching there may be some moisture in between that causes an electrochemical reaction. But since the disks touch it's shorted out. A small current will flow but the voltage between the disks is 0. I don't think there is a minimum thickness an electrolyte needs to have. It's just that cells that are shorted can't contribute to the total voltage of the battery.
In a zinc carbon cell the two electrodes are not Zn/C but Zn/MnO2. The carbon is just a conductor, it doesn't participate in the reaction. Also "depolariser" is strictly speaking not correct terminology. MnO2 is an oxidiser.
The reaction between Zn and MnO2 produces 1.4V because the energy liberated in that reaction is approximately 2.8eV per Zn atom. Probably a little higher but I don't know the exact number. There are 2 electrons released per Zn atom so about 1.4 eV per electron => 1.4V.
And there are lots of non-metals included in the electrochemical series
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrochemical_series
 
  • #10
Volta used salt water, so there should not be any resistance to current flow.
 
  • #11
There is not a film of water on everything, I do not believe that adsorption is that strong. As we would have problems isolating anything. But even such a monolayer existed, you cannot disregard the geometry. There is a diffusion of ions between the metal plates which produces the voltage. If this diffusion is much more efficient by orders of magnitude between adjacent plates than along some short cut path the voltage can still add up.
 

Similar threads

How Does Electron Flow Work in a Zn-Cu Electrochemical Cell?
Replies
3
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top