The way mathematics should be taught

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nano-Passion
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mathematics
AI Thread Summary
Mathematics education often fails to convey its inherent beauty, primarily focusing on memorization of formulas rather than fostering understanding through assisted self-discovery. Many students leave grammar and high school with a superficial grasp of concepts like the Pythagorean theorem, missing the deeper reasoning behind them. This lack of engagement contributes to mathematics being less popular compared to fields with more immediate real-world connections. The issue is compounded by a shortage of qualified teachers who can effectively teach mathematics in a way that reveals its beauty. Improving math education requires a shift towards teaching methods that emphasize understanding and context.
Nano-Passion
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
0
It bugs me how terrible my math classes were in grammar and high school. Many teach the beauty of mathematics at a superficial level. They simply teach you formulas largely through memorization. When it should be taught through assisted self-discovery, showing the bigger picture, etc..

At grammar school the following formula was slapped on the black board: c^2=a^2+b^2

All I saw was a bunch of letters and numbers, no beauty or "coolness factor" was discovered.

If it was taught the reasoning of it all through the teacher slowly showing us why c^2=a^2+b^2 I would have developed a liking towards the concept. Such as with
pythagorean2.png


Or through assisted self-discovery was taught the beauty of pi by the following dialogue and reasoning: http://www.worsleyschool.net/science/files/piorigin/piorigin.html

I would have seen more of the beauty of mathematics much earlier.

Seriously now, one of the reason that mathematics isn't one of the more popular fields is because the beauty is much more obscure and only gives itself up under careful scrutiny. It is much easier to develop a connection with other fields (psychology, etc.) because there is an immediate visible connection to the outside world.

Taking mathematics out of context and slapping formulas simply does no merit to the potential beauty that is often hidden by bad teaching.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Nano-Passion said:
It bugs me how terrible my math classes were in grammar and high school. Many teach the beauty of mathematics at a superficial level. They simply teach you formulas largely through memorization. When it should be taught through assisted self-discovery, showing the bigger picture, etc..

At grammar school the following formula was slapped on the black board: c^2=a^2+b^2

All I saw was a bunch of letters and numbers, no beauty or "coolness factor" was discovered.

If it was taught the reasoning of it all through the teacher slowly showing us why c^2=a^2+b^2 I would have developed a liking towards the concept. Such as with
pythagorean2.png


Or through assisted self-discovery was taught the beauty of pi by the following dialogue and reasoning: http://www.worsleyschool.net/science/files/piorigin/piorigin.html

I would have seen more of the beauty of mathematics much earlier.

Seriously now, one of the reason that mathematics isn't one of the more popular fields is because the beauty is much more obscure and only gives itself up under careful scrutiny. It is much easier to develop a connection with other fields (psychology, etc.) because there is an immediate visible connection to the outside world.

Taking mathematics out of context and slapping formulas simply does no merit to the potential beauty that is often hidden by bad teaching.

I think you are right but the real problem in my opinion is not teaching people how to think mathematically. Even a bad math text will reveal beauty to someone who knows how to think mathematically.
 
One thing you should note is that a lot of math teachers in pre-tertiary study do not have the background to teach in this context: most people with masters or other post graduate qualifications do not go into high school (and I don't blame them), and even those with bachelors tend not to go into teaching.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top