Theoretical Physics vs Theoretical Cosmology

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the differences between theoretical and experimental physicists, particularly in specialized fields like cosmology and particle physics. It highlights that the perceived popularity of these fields is less about public interest and more about practical funding opportunities. In the UK, academic pay is determined by a banding system based on tenure and duties rather than the subject area. Fields like nuclear physics attract more funding due to their clear practical applications, whereas cosmology, often viewed as more academic, faces challenges in securing financial support. Consequently, the number of professionals in cosmology is smaller, leading to increased competition for jobs, especially as many students transition into this field from related disciplines like particle physics.
flyingpig
Messages
2,574
Reaction score
1
What exactly is the difference? The latter does not seem so popular to me? On average how much does the latter earn?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sigh, I wrote out a giant reply and the computer crashed - lost it all.

In brief:

Physicists can generally be described as theoretical or experimental. Within these terms there are the area in which the physicist works to consider. e.g. Theoretical Particle physics, or experimental particle physics.

Cosmology is the subject area (though it is astronomy..)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_cosmology

It is really not a question of 'popularity' as much as practicallity. In the UK, where I live, for example - universities have a banding system to pay their academics. The longer you have spent at the institution and depending on your duties, your pay will increase. It does not depend on the subject in which you work.

The issue, then, is how easy it is for the university to secure funding for your subject area (after all, they need to convince other people that your subject is worth giving money to - so they can pay you to work on it.). Something like, say, nuclear physics has many practical applications; medical and power are obvious ones. These can be used as in-routes to obtain funding. With something like cosmology the interest might be seen as purely academic, with practical implications less obvious.

This means that it is more a question of how many people there are working in the field. The number of people working in something like cosmology world-wide will be much smaller than those working in many other areas of physics (there are of course institutions that have large groups which specialize in cosmology but overall there are less than other areas). And so, it will be more difficult to secure a future working in this field - many students will take this at graduate level (since many of the projects are highly computational, it is a good skill to gain) and if they all try to make a career of it, they'll find there aren't enough jobs to go around: there is also a lot of cross-over with particle physicists wanting to work on cosmology, making it even more competitive.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
263
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Back
Top