Theoretical pressure decay of a pressurised vessel

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving a method to plot the theoretical pressure decay of a pressurized vessel over time. Participants explore various assumptions and factors that could influence the pressure decay, including the type of gas, temperature, and flow characteristics. The scope includes theoretical modeling and approximations related to gas dynamics in a controlled environment.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks to derive a method for plotting internal vessel pressure against time, specifying known inputs such as gas type, vessel volume, and leak size.
  • Another participant raises concerns about the number of variables and the need for additional information if external conditions change.
  • Some participants suggest using transient simulations based on differential equations, including mass, energy, and volume balances, as well as orifice flow equations.
  • There is a discussion about the effects of moisture on gas flow, with one participant noting that cooling and condensation could affect the leak rate.
  • Participants mention approximations for pressure decay, including exponential decay and variations due to flow type (turbulent vs. laminar).
  • References to external resources for gas flow calculations and empirical formulas are provided to assist in estimating flow rates and pressure changes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the importance of moisture effects, the complexity of the model, and the assumptions required for accurate predictions. No consensus is reached on a definitive method or model for the pressure decay.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the assumptions about constant external conditions, the small pressure difference, and the potential impact of moisture on flow characteristics, which remains unresolved.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in gas dynamics, pressure vessel design, and theoretical modeling in engineering contexts.

DSOTM
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I am looking to derive a method of plotting the theoretical pressure decay of a pressurised vessel. I would like to end up with a graph that plots internal vessel pressure against time.

Is this possible?

What assumptions would I need to make?

The following inputs will be known.
  • Gas: air
  • Vessel volume is constant
  • Starting internal vessel pressure
  • Internal vessel temperature remains constant
  • External temperature remains constant
  • External pressure remains constant
  • Size of the leak aperture
  • Test duration
The internal pressure difference will be small, in the region of a few hundred Pascals.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Too many variables and you may not have enough information. If the external temperature and pressure are changing you need to know the rate of change over time (unless we are to assume it is linear). But the real problem is that the interest level in solving it is too low for the amount of work involved in finding a solution.
 
Thanks. We would assume internal temperature, external temperature and external pressure to remain constant. That's not clear in my post so will update.
 
Welcome to PF, by the way!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DSOTM
You can make a transient simulation from the differential equations. Include

mass balance
energy balance
volume balance
perfect gas law
orifice flow equations
include all the constraints and assumptions you mentioned.

I don't see an assumption about moisture in your list.
 
Yikes, i wouldn't even know where to start with that.

What do you need to know about moisture?

We're looking for a somewhat simplistic approximation, if that's even possible.
 
DSOTM said:
What do you need to know about moisture?
When your gas leaks out, it cools. Moisture condenses around the aperture, shrinking it. This decreases the volume of gas leaving, but may increase its speed, which would further reduce the temperature.

In extreme cases, you can actually freeze the hole.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
What is the type of gas and the average molecular weight of the gas ?
What is the viscosity of the gas ?

The first approximation will be an exponential decay.
The second approximation will be a couple of exponential decays due to switching between turbulent and laminar flow.
 
This is a handy reference for the occasional plumber:

https://files.valinonline.com/userfiles/documents/instrvalvetechguide.pdf

See 'Gas Flow Calculations'- approx middle the document. You should be able to find published data giving you Cv values for different orifice sizes - you can get a reasonably good estimate of the flow with that and the equations in the document. Once you have that, it's pretty simple to use excel to calculate the 'new' (reduced) tank pressure and orifice flow at the interval of your choice.

This isn't perfect - you may need to 'adjust' your Cv based on experimental results. There are more 'precise' ways to do this, but I'm not sure that they're much more accurate - assumptions are required no matter what approach you use.
 
  • #11
Vanadium 50 said:
When your gas leaks out, it cools. Moisture condenses around the aperture, shrinking it. This decreases the volume of gas leaving, but may increase its speed, which would further reduce the temperature.

In extreme cases, you can actually freeze the hole.
Ok with you now. So for a 50L vessel pressurised to 1000Pa we're looking at a leak of 0.5L/hr. So the flow rate is incredibly small. I would assume that the effects of moisture condensation are negligible.
 
  • #12
Baluncore said:
What is the type of gas and the average molecular weight of the gas ?
What is the viscosity of the gas ?

The first approximation will be an exponential decay.
The second approximation will be a couple of exponential decays due to switching between turbulent and laminar flow.
Gas is air. Temperature 15 deg C. Google tells me that corresponds to 1.81x10-5 kg/(m.s).
Molecular weight of 28.97gram/mol.

The flow rate is extremely small, i would assume the flow is not turbulent.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K