Theoretical/speculative orientation of Alevel boards in Physicsd

  • Thread starter Thread starter hobbes
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orientation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights that the three UK A level examination boards may vary in their approach to theoretical and speculative physics, with OCR Syllabus A appearing to emphasize theoretical understanding over rote memorization. Despite all boards adhering to the same curriculum set by the Department for Education, differences in depth and topic emphasis exist. Students are advised to follow their board's specific guidelines regarding mathematics, as using non-required mathematical techniques could lead to confusion or loss of marks, even if some boards do not explicitly penalize such practices. A strong theoretical grasp is encouraged over mere memorization to align with current trends in physics education.
hobbes
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
The three UK A level examination boards do not appear to examine to the same level of theoretical and speculative physics. Reading through the syllabi I suspect that OCR Syllabus A requires more theory than most, and less disgorging of learned information. I'd be grateful for advice on this, and in particular whether any Board penalises candidates who use mathematics that is not part of the mathematical requirements of the Board. Some of the examiners reports may imply that some boards do so penalise candidates.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


It is important to note that the A level examination boards in the UK all follow the same curriculum set by the Department for Education. Therefore, the level of theoretical and speculative physics examined should be consistent across all boards. However, it is possible that there may be slight variations in the depth and emphasis of certain topics between different boards.

Based on my experience with the A level physics syllabi, I do agree that OCR Syllabus A does seem to place a greater emphasis on theoretical understanding rather than simply regurgitating memorized information. This is in line with the current trend in physics education, which focuses on developing critical thinking and problem-solving skills rather than just knowledge retention.

In terms of using mathematics that is not part of the board's requirements, it is important for students to carefully follow the guidelines and specifications set by their respective boards. While some boards may not explicitly penalize the use of additional mathematics, it is always best to stick to the required mathematical techniques to avoid any potential confusion or loss of marks.

Overall, I would advise students to thoroughly study and understand the specific requirements and expectations of their chosen A level physics board, and to focus on developing a strong theoretical understanding of the subject rather than relying solely on memorization.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Back
Top