Theory of relativity - proton entering a medium

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the application of the theory of relativity to a proton entering a medium, specifically water. Key equations include the initial energy of the proton, ##E_i=\sqrt{c^2p^2+m_0^2c^4}##, and the final energy, ##E_f=\sqrt{c^2p_1^2+m_0^2c^4}##, where ##m_0## is the rest mass of the proton. Participants explore momentum conservation, leading to the equation ##p=p_1+p_2##, and discuss the implications of approximations on the calculations. Ultimately, the correct answer for the minimum magnitude of the proton's momentum is determined to be ##3.58 \times 10^{-37}##.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity concepts, including energy and momentum conservation.
  • Familiarity with the equations of relativistic energy, specifically the forms for initial and final energy of particles.
  • Basic knowledge of photon behavior in mediums, particularly in relation to momentum transfer.
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic equations, including quadratic and quartic forms.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of relativistic energy-momentum relationships in detail.
  • Learn about the behavior of particles, such as protons, when they enter different mediums, focusing on energy loss mechanisms.
  • Explore the implications of photon momentum in various reference frames and the associated conservation laws.
  • Investigate advanced algebraic techniques for solving complex equations, particularly in physics contexts.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on particle physics, relativity, and energy conservation principles. This discussion is also beneficial for anyone involved in experimental physics where particle interactions with mediums are relevant.

  • #31
TSny said:
Is the entire interaction of the proton with the water somehow taken into account by just using the dispersion relation E = cmp for the photon?
That's my understanding. I.e. it's not a 'solid' collision between the proton and water molecules, but the subtler relativistic interaction with a medium with index < 1. Not sure whether it's important that a proton carries charge - probably.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
haruspex said:
Cracked it! It also occurred to me in the middle of the night that I should just differentiate the surd equation wrt p1 and set dp/dp1=0. That gives p = m0ccm/√(c2-cm2) = p1. At first sight that looks useless, since it gives p = p1, but then it dawned on me that the likely alternative to setting p1=0 is to set p-p1 very small. Indeed, that corresponds to the photon getting a vanishingly small amount of energy. (With that assumption in the first place, we could have expanded the surds on the basis of small δp = p-p1 and got the result quite quickly.)
Numerically it gives 5.98.10-19. Why so different from the given answer? Because the given answer is wrong, 3.58.10-37 being the numerical value of p2.

Same answer I get. But what I did was to write the equation in post #19 in the form, ap2+bp+c=0. Then there will be two corresponding roots of with I chose the one which seemed minimum, yet doubtful. So I considered both the roots. I differentiated both the roots w.r.t p1, obviously putting dp/dp1=0 and solved. Obviously I checked that if d2p/dp12>0 for minima. I got, I think values, out of one seems to be following the minima condition. That was the answer same as what you got. And now, the copy on which I did this all is lost. :frown:
 
  • #33
The expression ##\sqrt{c^2p^2+m_0^2c^4} - \sqrt{c^2p_1^2+m_0^2c^4} = c_m(p - p_1)## can be rearranged as ##\sqrt{c^2p^2+m_0^2c^4} - c_mp = \sqrt{c^2p_1^2+m_0^2c^4} -c_mp_1##

Measuring ##p## in units of ##m_0c## and measuring ##c_m## in units of ##c## we have

##\sqrt{p^2+1} - c_mp = \sqrt{p_1^2+1} - c_mp_1##

Thus, defining ##f(p) = \sqrt{p^2+1} - c_mp## we have ##f(p) = f(p_1)##.

A plot of ##f(p)## for water (##c_m = .767##) is attached. The intersection of a horizontal line with the graph would correspond to possible initial and final momenta of the proton, with the initial momentum being the larger momentum. The minimum of the function occurs where the initial proton momentum would have its minimum value and still be able to emit a “soft” photon. This is seen to occur near ##p = 1.195 ## (or, ##5.98 \times 10^{-19}## kgm/s). This, of course, agrees with haruspex’s calculation.

In a vacuum, we would have cm = 1. The attachment shows a plot of f(p) for this case and we can see the function no longer takes on a minimum. So, as expected, the proton cannot emit a photon and conserve energy-momentum in a vacuum.

In fact, it is easy to show that the value of p that minimizes f(p) corresponds to the proton having a speed of cm. So, only when the proton enters the water with a speed greater than the speed of light in water can the proton emit a photon.

So I guess this has has something to do with Cherenkov radiation. But I wish I understood better why simply using ##E_{photon} = c_mp_{photon}## for the photon in water automatically takes into account transfer of energy and momentum with the water. I had never seen this before.
 

Attachments

  • photon emission by proton.jpg
    photon emission by proton.jpg
    26 KB · Views: 470
  • #34
Thanks Haruspex and TSny for your help. Your answers are correct. The solution for this problem was posted today. The solution reaches the same answer as you. And as TSny mentioned, the solution too gives a link to Cherenkov radiation. I will quote the solution:

First simplify by considering all the particles as moving in the x-direction. The initial particle energy and momentum is a point ##(p_i,E_i)## on the curve ##E_{prot}=\sqrt{c^2 p^2+m_{prot}^2c^4}##. So is the final proton energy and momentum a point ##(p_f,E_f)##, with ##p_f<p_i## and ##E_f<E_i##. If energy and momentum can be conserved when emitting a photon, these two points must be able to be connected by a line with slope ##c_m##. The lowest value of ##p_i## where this can happen is where the slope of the ##E(p)## curve for the proton equals ##c_m##. Hence we have ##\frac {dE} {dp}|_{p_{min}}=c_m## as our condition for the lowest value ##p_{min}## of the momentum for the initial proton. Algebraically solving this equation for ##p_{min}## yields the answer of ##5.98 \times 10^{-19}~kg~m/s##.Finally, the pretty blue light produced by high energy particles hitting water is called Cherenkov light and can be seen here.

I don't understand the part when it says that the points connect by a line with slope c_m. From where did this come from?

TSny said:
Measuring ##p## in units of ##m_0c## and measuring ##c_m## in units of ##c## we have
\sqrt{p^2+1} - c_mp = \sqrt{p_1^2+1} - c_mp_1
Can you please explain this to me?
 
  • #35
Start with
##\sqrt{c^2p^2+m_0^2c^4} - \sqrt{c^2p_1^2+m_0^2c^4} = c_m(p - p_1)##

and divide through by ##m_0c^2##. You will find that the equation simplifies to

##\sqrt{[p/(m_0c)]^2+1} - \sqrt{[p_1/(m_0c)]^2+1} = (c_m/c)[(p/(m_0c) - p_1/(m_0c)]##

So, if you measure p in units of ##m_0c## and measure ##c_m## in units of ##c##, you get

##\sqrt{p^2+1} - \sqrt{p_1^2+1} = c_m(p - p_1)##

Going back to the original equation and letting ##E(p) = \sqrt{c^2p^2+m_0^2c^4}##, you have ##E(p) - E(p_1) = c_m(p-p_1)##. Or,
\frac{E(p) - E(p_1)}{p-p_1} = c_m
The left-hand side is the slope of the line that connects two points on the ##E(p)## vs ##p## graph corresponding to initial and final momenta (##p## and ##p_1##) of the proton. So the above equation says that the slope of the line must be equal to ##c_m## if energy and momentum are to be conserved. Thus if you draw any straight line of slope ##c_m## such that it passes through two points of the graph of ##E(p)##, the two points will correspond to possible initial and final momenta of the proton such that energy and momentum will be conserved in photon emission. If you draw the line of slope ##c_m## such that it is tangent to the graph of ##E(p)##, then you will have the case where the initial and final momenta of the proton are equal and the emitted photon would have zero energy. The slope of the tangent line is the derivative ##E\:'(p)##. But ##E\:'(p)## can easily be shown to equal the speed of the proton. So, the minimum speed of the proton for photon emission is ##c_m##.
 
Last edited:
  • #36
TSny said:
Start with
##\sqrt{c^2p^2+m_0^2c^4} - \sqrt{c^2p_1^2+m_0^2c^4} = c_m(p - p_1)##

and divide through by ##m_0c^2##. You will find that the equation simplifies to

##\sqrt{[p/(m_0c)]^2+1} - \sqrt{[p_1/(m_0c)]^2+1} = (c_m/c)[(p/(m_0c) - p_1/(m_0c)]##

So, if you measure p in units of ##m_0c## and measure ##c_m## in units of ##c##, you get

##\sqrt{p^2+1} - \sqrt{p_1^2+1} = c_m(p - p_1)##

Going back to the original equation and letting ##E(p) = \sqrt{c^2p^2+m_0^2c^4}##, you have ##E(p) - E(p_1) = c_m(p-p_1)##. Or,
\frac{E(p) - E(p_1)}{p-p_1} = c_m
The left-hand side is the slope of the line that connects two points on the ##E(p)## vs ##p## graph corresponding to initial and final momenta (##p## and ##p_1##) of the proton. So the above equation says that the slope of the line must be equal to ##c_m## if energy and momentum are to be conserved. Thus if you draw any straight line of slope ##c_m## such that it passes through two points of the graph of ##E(p)##, the two points will correspond to possible initial and final momenta of the proton such that energy and momentum will be conserved in photon emission. If you draw the line of slope ##c_m## such that it is tangent to the graph of ##E(p)##, then you will have the case where the initial and final momenta of the proton are equal and the emitted photon would have zero energy. The slope of the tangent line is the derivative ##E\:'(p)##. But ##E\:'(p)## can easily be shown to equal the speed of the proton. So, the minimum speed of the proton for photon emission is ##c_m##.

Great explanation. Thanks a lot TSny! :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
11K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
Replies
55
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
751
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K