Thermal conductivity of metals

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on the thermal conductivity of metals, exploring the relationship between thermal and electrical conductivity, particularly in the context of the Wiedemann-Franz Law. Participants examine theoretical aspects, definitions, and specific examples, including comparisons of different materials.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant references the Wiedemann-Franz Law, suggesting a proportional relationship between thermal conductivity (K) and electrical conductivity (σ) at a given temperature, while noting that temperature affects these conductivities differently.
  • Another participant points out that the electronic heat capacity (C) is temperature-dependent, implying that this could influence thermal conductivity.
  • A different participant challenges the initial claim by presenting a comparison of aluminum and beryllium oxide, highlighting that a good electrical conductor can have lower thermal conductivity than an electrical insulator.
  • One participant clarifies that the Wiedemann-Franz Law applies specifically to electronic conduction and notes the existence of thermal conduction by lattice vibrations, suggesting a more complex picture of thermal conductivity in metals.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between thermal and electrical conductivity, particularly regarding the implications of the Wiedemann-Franz Law and the role of lattice conduction. There is no consensus on the interpretations presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the dependence of thermal conductivity on various factors, including temperature and material properties, but do not resolve the implications of these dependencies or the definitions involved.

Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0
Hi all

In the following link it says: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/thermo/thercond.html

"For metals, the thermal conductivity is quite high, and those metals which are the best electrical conductors are also the best thermal conductors. At a given temperature, the thermal and electrical conductivities of metals are proportional, but raising the temperature increases the thermal conductivity while decreasing the electrical conductivity. This behavior is quantified in the Wiedemann-Franz Law:

<br /> \frac{K}{\sigma}\propto T<br />
."

Here K is the thermal conductivity, sigma is the electrical conductivity and T is the temperature.

They say further

"Qualitatively, this relationship is based upon the fact that the heat and electrical transport both involve the free electrons in the metal. The thermal conductivity increases with the average particle velocity since that increases the forward transport of energy."

In my book, the thermal conductivity is given by K\propto Cv_Fl, where C is the heat capacity, vF is the Fermi velocity and l is the mean free path.

The Fermi velocity is constant, right? So why is it they say that the thermal conductivity goes up with increasing temperature?
 
Science news on Phys.org
The electronic heat capacity C depends on temperature.
 
Niles said:
In the following link it says: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/thermo/thercond.html

"For metals, the thermal conductivity is quite high, and those metals which are the best electrical conductors are also the best thermal conductors. "
Please look at this list of thermal conductivity:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_thermal_conductivities
and look at aluminum (a good electrical conductor) and then the material just underneath that has a thermal conductivity 5 times higher. It is beryllium oxide, an excellent electrical INSULATOR!
Bob S.
 
Wiedemann-Franz law applies to electronic conduction only.
Both electrical and thermal conduction coefficients in that ratio are electronic.
There is thermal conduction by lattice too.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
14K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K