Thermal Expansion of a Triangular Frame

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the thermal expansion of a triangular frame with equal initial lengths for each side. The equation derived from the Pythagorean Theorem suggests a relationship between the coefficients of thermal expansion for the frame's sides. A key question raised is whether the angle at point D can remain a right angle during expansion, given the symmetry and forces at play. It is argued that if angles can change without causing structural failure, the frame could expand while maintaining its equilateral shape. The conversation highlights the complexities of thermal expansion in rigid structures and the assumptions necessary for analyzing such scenarios.
SilverSoldier
Messages
26
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
##ABC## is an equilateral triangle constructed out of 5 rods, ##AD## and ##DB## having coefficient of expansion ##\alpha##, ##BC## and ##CA## having coefficient of expansion ##\lambda## and ##CD## having coefficient of expansion ##\mu##.
Find in terms of ##\alpha## and ##\lambda## a value for ##\mu## so that rod ##CD## shan't break, when the temperature of the system is increased by ##\theta##, given ##\alpha^2\theta^2##, ##\lambda^2\theta^2## and ##\mu^2\theta^2## are negligible.
Relevant Equations
##e = l\alpha\theta##, where ##e## = expansion, ##l## = initial length, ##\alpha## = coefficient of expansion, and ##\theta## = change in temperature
1623340291194.png

Suppose each side has initial length ##l##. The solution taught to me is as follows.

Considering the lengths of the rods after expansion, we write $$\dfrac{3l^2}{4}\left(1+\mu\theta\right)^2+\dfrac{l^2}{4}\left(1+\alpha\theta\right)^2=l^2\left(1+\lambda\theta\right)^2$$ according to the Pythagorean Theorem, which yields $$\mu=\dfrac{4\lambda-\alpha}{3}.$$ My question is, is there any reason to assume that the angle at ##D## remains a right angle?

The way I understand it, due to symmetry, any horizontal movement of points ##C## and ##D## is prevented by equal and opposite horizontal forces caused at ##C## and ##D##, so ##CD## may only expand vertically, but no such statement could be made about points ##A## and ##B##. So, isn't it possible that it expands into a structure like this?

1623339169714.png

Is it correct to say that the situation described in the solution happens only if ##D## were clamped to a fixed point, or held fixed by some other means?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SilverSoldier said:
is there any reason to assume that the angle at D remains a right angle?
If the angles of the triangles are permitted to change then there is no reason for anything to break, so you have to assume that any change in an angle constitutes breakage.
 
Suppose that, upon heating, the original triangle expands in a way that it retains its equilateral shape (much like enlarging a photograph). Then all angles will remain the same as @haruspex noted. At the bottom left corner, you will have something like the blue triangle shown below. Any ideas where to go from here?

Equilateral triangles.png
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top