Thermal Expansion of A-36 Steel Rails: -20F to 90F

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the required gap between A-36 steel rails to accommodate thermal expansion from -20°F to 90°F. The deformation calculated is 0.34848 inches, which should be split between both ends of the rail, resulting in an expansion of 0.17424 inches per side. The conversation also highlights the implications of rail expansion in practical scenarios, particularly with continuous welded rail (CWR) systems, which eliminate gaps and may require different considerations for thermal expansion management.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermal expansion principles
  • Familiarity with A-36 steel properties
  • Knowledge of rail engineering and design
  • Basic mathematical skills for applying the formula δ=αΔTL
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the thermal expansion coefficient for A-36 steel
  • Explore the design principles of continuous welded rail (CWR)
  • Learn about the effects of temperature variations on rail alignment
  • Investigate methods for mitigating rail buckling due to thermal expansion
USEFUL FOR

Railway engineers, civil engineers, and professionals involved in rail infrastructure design and maintenance will benefit from this discussion, particularly those focused on thermal expansion management in rail systems.

gv3
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The 40 ft long A-36 steel rails on a train track are laid with a small gap between them to allow for thermal expansion. Determine the required gap in inches so that the rails just touch one another when the temperature is increased from -20 F to 90 F. The cross sectional area of each rail is 5.10 in2.
engineering.jpg


So i was able to find out the deformation on the rail. My question is, does the .34848in get split between both ends of the rail since both sides are free ends? So each side would expand .17424in?

Homework Equations


δ=αΔTL[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution


δ=αΔTL= .34848 in[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Does it make any difference?
Consider having a large number of rails, as in reality you would. Then think about the total expansion of the rails, then the total gap required, then the gap between each rail.
 
Merlin3189 said:
Does it make any difference?
Consider having a large number of rails, as in reality you would. Then think about the total expansion of the rails, then the total gap required, then the gap between each rail.
well because i was thinking that not only will the rail in the middle expand, but the one on the left and right of it would also expand. So if the deformation wasn't split between both ends, the gap would have to be 2δ. Because the rail in the middle will expand by δ and the rails next to it will also expand by δ.
 
Yes, one side would expand 0.1742, but the adjacent rail would also expand by that much.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gv3
I think that is what is intended to happen. My point was simply about the calculation.

But I wonder if that may be a practical problem for RR engineers? The rail doesn't know which way it is supposed to move, so if the spikes and ties aren't uniform, the rail could move slightly asymmetrically when it expands and contracts. Over years perhaps the rails could creep and make the gaps vary in size?

Anyhow, over here we are moving to continuous welded rail, so there are no gaps any more. What happens when the rails warm up, I don't know. I think some CWR is laid hot, so that it lives in various states of tension. Maybe with stronger ties and fixings expansion forces can now be resisted and not cause buckling?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gv3

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
13K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
14K
Replies
10
Views
14K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K