Thermal Insulation Thickness Calculations

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter salvatore13
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Insulation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the required thickness of thermal insulation, particularly in the context of an engine bay with forced air cooling. Participants explore the underlying equations and principles, including heat conduction, convection, and the use of an online calculator for insulation thickness.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant shares a link to an online calculator for insulation thickness and seeks to understand the equations used in the calculation, suggesting it involves heat conduction and possibly convection and radiation effects.
  • Another participant mentions that the calculator employs Fourier's law in one dimension and questions the necessity of reverse-engineering it, suggesting that building a personal calculation might be more beneficial.
  • Concerns are raised about whether the calculator accounts for convective heat transfer resistance on both sides of the insulation.
  • A participant describes their specific application involving known parameters such as inside and outside air temperatures, material properties, and desired surface temperatures, indicating they are on the right track with their inputs.
  • There is a discussion about the heat transfer equation involving the convection heat transfer coefficient and its variability based on experimental conditions, with a reference to typical values for forced convection.
  • One participant outlines their approach to calculating insulation thickness using a series of heat transfer equations, but notes discrepancies between their results and those from the calculator, prompting a request for advice on potential errors in their calculations.
  • A later reply introduces additional variables and equations to account for temperature differences across various materials, suggesting a more complex model for heat transfer.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the calculator accounts for convective heat transfer and whether their own calculations align with the results from the calculator. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the accuracy of the calculator and the participants' individual calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity of heat transfer calculations, including the dependence on various parameters such as the convection heat transfer coefficient, which is experimentally determined and varies with conditions. There are also unresolved mathematical steps in the participants' calculations that may contribute to discrepancies.

salvatore13
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Derive equation used for insulation calculations.
I found this online calculator for insulation thickness: https://insulation.com.au/calculator/thickness-required/

Can you help me find equation being used for the calculation?

Based on inputs required, my understanding is that it must be heat conduction calculations but also accounting for convection and/or radiation effects on the inside and outside.

1711352992853.png
 
Science news on Phys.org
:welcome: !

This calculator uses Fouriers law in one diimension. Familiar with that ?

Curiosity can be a reason to reverse-engineer that, but it may be more useful to build up your own calculation. What's your application ?

##\ ##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
I don't think that the calculator in your reference includes convective heat transfer resistance inside and outside the insulation.
 
Chestermiller said:
I don't think that the calculator in your reference includes convective heat transfer resistance inside and outside the insulation.

Change input to
1711365203329.png

and to
1711365247539.png

indicates it does, or am I mistaken ?

##\ ##
 
BvU said:
:welcome: !

This calculator uses Fouriers law in one diimension. Familiar with that ?

Curiosity can be a reason to reverse-engineer that, but it may be more useful to build up your own calculation. What's your application ?

##\ ##

I’m calculating insulation thickness for an engine bay with forced air cooling. Known parameters are
- inside air temperature (forced flow)
- outside air temperature (static)
- material properties of the engine bay enclosure and insulation, and finally
- maximum allowed outside surface temperature of the engine bay enclosure

The calculator I’ve given as an example is using all these as an input so this tells me I’m on the right track.

Ideally I’d like to plot the temperature on the outside of the engine bay enclosure vs insulation thickness

I could just use the calculator but I want to understand where the values are coming from just for my own curiosity :)

You mentioned Fouriers law which describes conductivity but this calculator seems to also account for convection. I’m not sure how to tackle that…
 
salvatore13 said:
I want to understand where the values are coming from just for my own curiosity :)
I can appreciate that !

Basically you have heat transfer ##\dot Q## over a series of resistances going from ##T_{hot} ## to ##T_{cold}##.

As with conductance, there is a relationship ##\dot Q = h A \Delta T## where all the knowledge is in the convection heat transfer coefficient ##h## ( W/(m2##\cdot##K) ).
##\Delta T## is the temperature difference between surface and bulk.

Ominously, my thermodynamics book (Cengel) says ##h## is an experimentally determined parameter whose value depends on all the variables that ... etc. Typical is 25-250 W/(m2##\cdot##K for forced convection of gases. Hmm...

(your calculator uses ##h = 22## it seems: 146 degrees with 'Inside surface temp equals operating temp' gives the same 22.48 mm).

##\ ##
 
BvU said:
I can appreciate that !

Basically you have heat transfer ##\dot Q## over a series of resistances going from ##T_{hot} ## to ##T_{cold}##.

As with conductance, there is a relationship ##\dot Q = h A \Delta T## where all the knowledge is in the convection heat transfer coefficient ##h## ( W/(m2##\cdot##K) ).
##\Delta T## is the temperature difference between surface and bulk.

Ominously, my thermodynamics book (Cengel) says ##h## is an experimentally determined parameter whose value depends on all the variables that ... etc. Typical is 25-250 W/(m2##\cdot##K for forced convection of gases. Hmm...

(your calculator uses ##h = 22## it seems: 146 degrees with 'Inside surface temp equals operating temp' gives the same 22.48 mm).

##\ ##
Thanks for the tip - I've tried to solve the problem and my equations give me somewhat sensible results but they don't match the result from the calculator. I'll try to walk you through it briefly.

The diagram for the problem:
1711449441450.png


For thermal equilibrium, I'm assuming that heat flux in and outside the panel must be equal so that temperatures remain constant.
##\dot Q_1 = \dot Q_2 = \dot Q_3## because ##T_1,T_2, T_{outside}, T_{inside} = constant##

For the worst-case scenario, ##\dot Q_1## can be omitted and simply
##T_1 = T_{inside}##

For Conduction through the insulation (##\dot Q_2##):
##\frac {\dot Q_2}{A} = \frac {T_1-T_2}{\frac {t_{ins}}{k_{ins}}}##
I'm ignoring the aluminium panel as it has a negligible thermal resistance.

For Convection between insulation and outside ambient air (##\dot Q_3##):
##\frac {\dot Q_3}{A} = h_3(T_2-T_{outside})##

So since:
##\dot Q_2 = \dot Q_3##

Then:
##\frac {T_1-T_2}{\frac {t_{ins}}{k_{ins}}} = h_3(T_2-T_{outside})##

And from that I come up with this solution for thickness:
##t_{ins} = \frac {k_{ins}(T_1-T_2)}{h_3(T_2-T_{out})}##

But when I plug in the same input from the calculator and h = 22, the result is thickness = 8.5mm instead 22.48 as it should be.

Any advice on what I'm doing wrong? :)
 
Last edited:
Let ##T_3## be the temperature between the aluminum and the insulation. Then, $$T_{outside}-T_1=\frac{q}{h_{outside}}$$
$$T_1-T_3=q\frac{b_{insulation}}{k_{insulation}}$$$$T_3-T_2=q\frac{b_{aluminum}}{k_{aluminum}}$$$$T_2-T_{inside}=\frac{q}{h_{inside}}$$. Add these equations together to eliminate T1, T2, and T3
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
604
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K