Thermal Physics Introduction- solving for entropy and temperature change

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a thermal physics problem involving a container divided into two sections with different amounts of a monatomic ideal gas at varying temperatures. Participants explore the final temperature after thermal equilibrium and the change in entropy of the system.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants attempt to apply energy equations to find the final temperature and discuss the implications of their calculations. There are questions about the signs of temperature differences and the validity of the computed final temperature. The entropy change calculations are also scrutinized, with participants noting potential missing constants and the need to sum changes from both sides of the container.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the temperature and entropy calculations, with some participants expressing uncertainty about their results. A few have reached similar conclusions regarding the entropy change, but there is no explicit consensus on the final answers yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information available for their calculations. There are indications of confusion regarding constants and coefficients in their equations, which could affect their final results.

bbolddaslove
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A container is divided into two parts by a thermally conducting wall. There are N atoms of a monatomic ideal gas on the left side, 2N on the right. The gas on the left is initially at absolute temperature 200K, the gas on the right at 500K.
a. After thermal equilibrium is reached, what is the temperature in the box (on either side)?
b. How much does the entropy of the whole system change in reaching thermal equilibrium?

T_L=N
T_R=2N
T_f=final temp


Homework Equations




E=(3/2)N*k_b*T
deltaE=deltaQ
dS=(k_b*T)^-1*dQ


The Attempt at a Solution



a. For the first part, I used the equation for E to get (3/2)N*k_b*(T_f-T_L)=deltaQ and (3)N*k_b*(T_f-T_R)=-deltaQ, because deltaE_L=-deltaE_R

(3/2)N*k_b*(T_f-T_L)=-(3)N*k_b*(T_f-T_R), then crossing out k_b and N and solving:
T_f-T_L=2(T_f-T_R)
so T_f=2T_R-T_L = 1000K-200K = 800K
I'm not sure if i did this right or not

b. dS=(k_b*T)^-1*dQ and dQ=dE, so
dS=(k_b*T)^-1*(3/2)N*k_b*dT for the left side
dS=(3/2)N*T^-1*dT
S=(3/2)N*ln(T) from T_L to T_f, so
S=(3/2)N*ln(T_f/T_L)
and similarly, S=3N*ln(T_f/T_R)

I know that I'm missing a k_b in the end. The entropy on either side of the wall is not equivalent. I'm not sure where I went wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bbolddaslove said:

Homework Statement



A container is divided into two parts by a thermally conducting wall. There are N atoms of a monatomic ideal gas on the left side, 2N on the right. The gas on the left is initially at absolute temperature 200K, the gas on the right at 500K.
a. After thermal equilibrium is reached, what is the temperature in the box (on either side)?
b. How much does the entropy of the whole system change in reaching thermal equilibrium?

T_L=N
T_R=2N
T_f=final temp


Homework Equations




E=(3/2)N*k_b*T
deltaE=deltaQ
dS=(k_b*T)^-1*dQ


The Attempt at a Solution



a. For the first part, I used the equation for E to get (3/2)N*k_b*(T_f-T_L)=deltaQ and (3)N*k_b*(T_f-T_R)=-deltaQ, because deltaE_L=-deltaE_R

(3/2)N*k_b*(T_f-T_L)=-(3)N*k_b*(T_f-T_R), then crossing out k_b and N and solving:
T_f-T_L=2(T_f-T_R)\\

Well, you know that T_f - T-L has to be positive and T_f - T_R has to be negative, right? So how can those two differences have the same sign?
You need to get the right T_f first.

so T_f=2T_R-T_L = 1000K-200K = 800K
I'm not sure if i did this right or not
Well, that would be a neat trick; you're starting with 200K and 500K and end up with 800K without doing any work or adding heat to the system?
b. dS=(k_b*T)^-1*dQ and dQ=dE, so
dS=(k_b*T)^-1*(3/2)N*k_b*dT for the left side
dS=(3/2)N*T^-1*dT
S=(3/2)N*ln(T) from T_L to T_f, so
S=(3/2)N*ln(T_f/T_L)
and similarly, S=3N*ln(T_f/T_R)

I know that I'm missing a k_b in the end. The entropy on either side of the wall is not equivalent. I'm not sure where I went wrong.
[/b]

Your S is the change in entropy, not the entropy. So there's a change in S on the left = ΔS_L and a change in the right ΔS_R, and the total entropy change for your system is ΔS_total = ΔS_L + ΔS_R.

So now recompute those entropy changes and then sum. Just don't get a negative result for the net change in S, or Clausius et al will roll over in their graves! :biggrin:
 
Okay so I recomputed the temperature using -(Tf-Tr) and got 400. From there i got left S= (3/2)N*ln(2) (Tf/Tl = 2) which gave me 1.04N J/K. On the right I got S=3N*ln(4/5) which was -.669N J/K. I summed them, but I think I'm still missing a k_b somewhere. I crossed them out in the same step i.e.
dS=(k_b*T)^-1*(3/2)N*k_b*dT for the left side
dS=(3/2)N*T^-1*dT

but the answer when multiplied by N without a k_b is too large, isn't it?
 
bbolddaslove said:
Okay so I recomputed the temperature using -(Tf-Tr) and got 400. From there i got left S= (3/2)N*ln(2) (Tf/Tl = 2) which gave me 1.04N J/K. On the right I got S=3N*ln(4/5) which was -.669N J/K. I summed them, but I think I'm still missing a k_b somewhere. I crossed them out in the same step i.e.
dS=(k_b*T)^-1*(3/2)N*k_b*dT for the left side
dS=(3/2)N*T^-1*dT

but the answer when multiplied by N without a k_b is too large, isn't it?

I'm not sure what the b is in your equations, but somewhere you dropped something all right.You have the right expressions for the two entropy changes now, except for a constant coefficient. If you just keep track of your coefficients (the N, k, b etc.) you will get the right answer.

Hint: one form of that coefficient is: divide N by some (big) number, then multiply by another number involving R, the universal gas constant. It doesn't involve k or b in that form.

I have my answer waiting if you want to compare w/ yours.
 
I got .370N*k_b where k_b is the Boltzmann constant 1.38E-23, does that look like yours?
 
Must be absolutely correct! We agree!
 
Thank you!
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K