Thermionic Emission: Questions Explained

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on thermionic emission, specifically the mathematical representation of current density (J) in relation to electron energy levels and K-space. Key concepts include the work function (W), Fermi Level (E_{f}), and the integral representation of J, which incorporates the density of states and the probability of occupation of energy states. Participants clarify that K-space is essential for describing electron momentum, even for free electrons, and that thermal velocities contribute to net current flow without an external electric field. The Richardson-Dushman model is suggested for further understanding.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermionic emission principles
  • Familiarity with solid state physics and K-space concepts
  • Knowledge of current density calculations in physics
  • Basic grasp of the Richardson-Dushman model
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Richardson-Dushman model for thermionic emission
  • Explore K-space representation in solid state physics
  • Review the dispersion relation for the free-electron gas
  • Investigate the relationship between thermal velocities and current density
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, researchers in solid state physics, and anyone studying thermionic emission and current density calculations will benefit from this discussion.

chimay
Messages
81
Reaction score
8
Hi,

in the latest lesson my professor explained the thermionic emission; I guess it is a simplified approach, since I am not a Physicist.
Anyway, there are some things not clear to me; I'll show you the approach and I hope someone of you could help me.

As usual, W= work function and E_{f}= Fermi Level and J= current density
The solution is straightforward:
J= -q \int 2 \frac{d^{3} \bar k\ }{(2\pi)^{3}} \frac{1}{e^{\frac{E_{z}+E_{||}-E_{f}}{kT}+1}} \frac{1}{\hbar} \frac{dE_{z}}{dK_{z}}
E=\frac{{\hbar}^{2}}{2m^{*}} ( {K_{x}}^{2}+{K_{y}}^{2}+{K_{z}}^{2} )= E_{||}+E_{z} and z is the direction of flowing of the current.

2 \frac{d^{3} \bar k\ }{(2\pi)^{3}} is the density of states per unit volume

\frac{1}{e^{\frac{E_{z}+E_{||}-E_{f}}{kT}+1}} is the probability of occupation of each state

\frac{1}{\hbar} \frac{dE_{z}}{dK_{z}} is the velocity of each carrier

Since d^{3} \bar k\ = d^{2}k_{||}*dK_{z}
J= \frac{-2q}{{2\pi}^{3}\hbar} \int d^{2}k_{||} \int_{E_0}^{+\infty} dE_{z} \frac{1}{e^{\frac{E_{z}+E_{||}-E_{f}}{kT}+1}}
E_{0}= E_{f}+W

My questions are the following ones:
- the integral goes from E_{0} to + \infty; since electrons that have energy higher than E_{0} are "free", why are concepts like the K-space still used? Are they related to electrons bounded in a crystal, are they?
- in the integral there is no reference to any electric field applied. I can't understand how can we have a net current just by summing thermal velocities.

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Good questions - but they seem to be a matter of definition:
1. check what K represents.
2. check what "thermionic emission" means.
 
  • Like
Likes chimay
Your answer is not clear to me , should it be a kind of "hint" to solve my questions?

I have thought about the problem since yesterday, but I really can't solve it.
Suppose for a moment that an electron with energy above E_{0} can still be described by means of K-Space (I am not convinced about this, it is an assumption).
Basically, the explanation of the integral is the following: let's choose a surface S, for each K we have a certain current density J= -qn(K)V_{z}(K), let's sum them all togheter and we get the overall current. It seem like taking a piece of metal and expecting a current flowing just by thermal agitation.

Obviously this is no the case of thermion emission, since the elctrons escaping from surface (please refer to the figure) do not have a counterpart coming inside the metal, my problem is how this is translated into mathematical language.

Thank you very much
 

Attachments

  • Da caricare.png
    Da caricare.png
    1.4 KB · Views: 520
chimay said:
My questions are the following ones:
- the integral goes from E_{0} to + \infty; since electrons that have energy higher than E_{0} are "free", why are concepts like the K-space still used? Are they related to electrons bounded in a crystal, are they?

No. Every electrons will have a momentum. Even in the free-electron gas model, you have a distribution of momentum. So that is why the description is in k-space. In fact, in solid state physics, this is the most useful representation, because especially in any diffraction experiments, the results are equivalent to probing the k-space structure.

- in the integral there is no reference to any electric field applied. I can't understand how can we have a net current just by summing thermal velocities.

Thank you

Again, there is a distribution of momentum of the electrons. There will be a net flow of electrons coming out of the solid due to the fact that they have a momentum component perpendicular to the surface. So you will get a current.

BTW, a more detailed explanation on this is via the Richardson-Dushman model.

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes chimay
Actually, We have not studied the free-electron gas model.
Could you please give an explanation (even qualitative) without referring to it?

Thank you
 
chimay said:
Actually, We have not studied the free-electron gas model.
Could you please give an explanation (even qualitative) without referring to it?

Thank you

http://www.inorg.chem.uni-sofia.bg/Courses/03/Freelgas.pdf

In particular, look at the dispersion relation for the free-electron gas.

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes chimay
Thank you, I will read it as soon as I can.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
729
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K