Thermochemistry 2: Zn w/ HCl & Sulfuric Acid -150 kJ

  • Thread starter Thread starter ph_lover3294
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thermochemistry
AI Thread Summary
Zinc reacts with hydrochloric acid (HCl) to produce zinc chloride and hydrogen gas, releasing -150 kJ of energy. The discussion shifts to how many moles of sulfuric acid (H2SO4) would yield the same heat change when reacting with excess zinc. One participant suggests that one mole of sulfuric acid is needed for the reaction Zn + H2SO4 → ZnSO4 + H2. Another contributor advises writing the net ionic reaction to clarify the process. The conversation emphasizes understanding the thermochemical principles behind the reactions.
ph_lover3294
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
hi

zinc reacts with HCl according to the eq

Zn + 2HCl ------> ZnCl2 + H2 , delta H= -150 kj

* IF SULPHURIC ACID IS USED INSTEAD HCl ..jow many moles of sulphuric acid react with excess amount of zinc so the change in heat content is -150 kj
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to try by yourself first.

Besides, it looks like a homework question to me, and this is not a forum for HW.
 
hi

firstly its not a homework question

secondly i tried but I am not sure

i said that the answer will be (one mole )as Zn +H2SO4---->ZnSO4 + H2
but i don't know is it write or wrong ?

thank u
 
Write net ionic reaction equation, it should be obvious then. But you seem to be on the right track.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top