Thermocouple Accuracy and Noise?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the use of the MAX31855 thermocouple-to-digital converter for measuring temperatures between 0-350°C. The ADC within the MAX31855 provides a consistent output resolution of 0.25°C across all thermocouple types (K, J, N, T, S, R, and E). The user inquires about the comparative accuracy and noise levels of these thermocouple types, concluding that the ADC is not a limiting factor in performance, thus prompting a deeper exploration of the inherent characteristics of each thermocouple type.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermocouple types (K, J, N, T, S, R, E)
  • Familiarity with the MAX31855 thermocouple-to-digital converter
  • Knowledge of temperature measurement principles
  • Basic concepts of signal noise and accuracy in sensors
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the accuracy specifications of each thermocouple type (K, J, N, T, S, R, E)
  • Investigate the noise characteristics of the MAX31855 with different thermocouples
  • Learn about thermocouple calibration techniques
  • Explore alternative thermocouple-to-digital converters and their performance metrics
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, technicians, and researchers involved in temperature measurement and sensor technology, particularly those utilizing the MAX31855 thermocouple-to-digital converter.

tangodirt
Messages
51
Reaction score
1
I'm looking to use the MAX31855 thermocouple-to-digital converter, to measure temperatures in the range of 0-350C. According to the manufacturer, the ADC inside the chip is identical for every different type of thermocouple, just a different sensitivity is programmed in depending on the type of thermocouple you want to use. So, each chip, regardless of thermocouple type, outputs at a 0.25C resolution.

Therefore, since every type of thermocouple that the chip is trimmed for will read my range, is there any inherent advantage to one over another (K, J, N, T, S, R, and E)?

Specifically, are any (on average) more accurate than another? Do any of them have less inherent noise? Are there any advantages to one over another? Thanks!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
5K