Thermodynamic Adiabats: Solving U=aP^2V

  • Thread starter Thread starter Joe Cool
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thermodynamic
Joe Cool
Messages
17
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


The internal Energy of a system is ##U=aP^2V## with a positive constant a. Find the adiabats of this system in the P-V plane.
The solution is $$P=\frac 1 a\left( \sqrt{\frac {V_0} V}-1\right)$$

2. The attempt at a solution
the first law with the given internal energy:
$$a(2PVdP+P^2dV)=-PdV$$
Integration:
$$\frac {2adP} {1+aP}=- \frac{dV} V$$
$$2 ln(1+aP) = -lnV+const.$$
and
$$(1+aP)^2=\frac 1 V+const.$$
$$P=\frac 1 a\left( \sqrt{\frac 1 V+const}-1\right)$$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Joe Cool said:
$$2 ln(1+aP) = -lnV+const.$$
and
$$(1+aP)^2=\frac 1 V+const.$$
You have a small but crucial error in going from the first equation above to the second.
 
  • Like
Likes Chestermiller
Thanks for your Tip. Should it be like that?
##ln((1+aP)^2)=ln\frac 1 V+lnV_0=ln\frac {V_0} V## with ##V_0=e^{const.}##
 
Joe Cool said:
Thanks for your Tip. Should it be like that?
##ln((1+aP)^2)=ln\frac 1 V+lnV_0=ln\frac {V_0} V## with ##V_0=e^{const.}##
Yes, that's a nice way to do it.

The important thing is that if you have something like ##\ln y = \ln x + const##, it does not follow that ##y = x + const##.

If you have ##\ln y = \ln x + k## where ##k## is a constant, then "taking exponentials of both sides" yields
##e^{\ln y} = e^{\ln x + k} = e^k e^{\ln x}##.

So, ##\ln y = \ln x + k## implies ##y = C x ## where ##C = e^k## is a new constant.
 
  • Like
Likes Joe Cool
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top