Thinking algorithms and how to amplify analytical methods in daily life

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on enhancing cognitive skills and analytical methods for engineering students aspiring to become scientists. Participants emphasize the importance of practical problem-solving techniques over solving logic puzzles, advocating for a scientific approach to everyday events. Key strategies include processing mathematical equations during calm moments and engaging in hands-on building projects to improve engineering skills. The conversation highlights the necessity of developing a mindset that asks "why" and "how" to foster deeper understanding and problem-solving abilities.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integral calculus and differential equations
  • Basic knowledge of cognitive skills development
  • Familiarity with scientific inquiry methods
  • Experience with hands-on engineering projects
NEXT STEPS
  • Research techniques for mental math and equation processing
  • Explore methods for scientific thinking and inquiry
  • Learn about effective problem-solving strategies in engineering
  • Investigate hands-on project ideas to enhance practical skills
USEFUL FOR

Engineering students, aspiring scientists, and anyone looking to improve their analytical thinking and problem-solving skills in technical fields.

issac newton
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I am an engineering student. I am an average student. I don't think my methods of analysis and thinking are proper. I did take steps to improve my thinking abilities by becoming a left-handed person, solving sudoku and lateral thinking puzzles.

I want to be a scientist in my life. But i heard that scientists solve problems on mind and write equations in thin air. i tried them and failed absolutely.

can we solve problems (like integral calculus,differential equations,etc) with little practice , like scientists do?

kindly suggest me some links or methods through which i can improve my cognitive skills to face non-linear and tough problems like engineers( and scientists) do.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Issac Newton said:
I am an engineering student. I am an average student. I don't think my methods of analysis and thinking are proper. I did take steps to improve my thinking abilities by becoming a left-handed person, solving sudoku and lateral thinking puzzles.

I want to be a scientist in my life. But i heard that scientists solve problems on mind and write equations in thin air. i tried them and failed absolutely.

can we solve problems (like integral calculus,differential equations,etc) with little practice , like scientists do?

kindly suggest me some links or methods through which i can improve my cognitive skills to face non-linear and tough problems like engineers( and scientists) do.

Solving random logic puzzles isn't really that useful. It's just a waste of time and for the most part useless unless you intend to kill time. The only point I see of solving logic puzzles is if you can win prizes with them, are trying to prove a mathematical theorem with them, or are trying to show off to a friend, and all of these instances are quite rare, so don't bother really.

Instead, try to think about everyday events in a scientific manner. Such as asking question... why did this happen? why did I do this? how does this work? what can I do to fix this?

Basically, questions beginning with a "why" or "how".

Regarding mathematics,
Also, try to process equations in your head when you are in the bathroom, sleeping, or when you are alone walking in the street. In those moments your mind is usually very calm and that is when it can produce the most. Not when it is super stressed out at the desk.

And to improve engineering, try to build stuff.

BiP
 

Similar threads

Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
32
Views
13K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
637
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K