How to prepare for a life in research?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around how a high school student interested in pursuing a research career in physics can prepare for that path. Participants explore various study methods and approaches that may foster a research-oriented mindset, touching on topics from theoretical problem formulation to practical projects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a desire to learn in a way that cultivates a research mindset, suggesting that formulating theoretical problems and seeking solutions independently can enhance understanding.
  • Another participant argues that worrying about potential PhD topics before graduating high school may be premature.
  • A later reply clarifies that the focus should be on how to study various subjects (physics, chemistry, math) to gain an advantage in research, questioning whether the study process influences future research capabilities.
  • One participant shares personal experiences, advocating for hands-on projects as a means to think creatively and develop problem-solving skills, citing examples of building complex devices and engaging in practical experiments.
  • Suggestions include tackling past competition questions in math and undertaking independent projects in physics and engineering to stretch knowledge and skills.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best approach to prepare for a research career. Multiple viewpoints exist regarding the importance of early topic selection and the value of practical projects versus theoretical study.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations in the discussion include the lack of specific methodologies for studying effectively and the dependence on individual interests and subject areas, which may affect the applicability of suggestions.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to high school students considering a future in research, educators looking for insights on student preparation, and individuals exploring effective study techniques in STEM fields.

Wrichik Basu
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
2,186
Reaction score
2,694
I am student who wants to do research in physics, and aims for a life in research.

Being in the final year of high school, I do not get a lot of time to devote to my passion - physics and related experiments. About 30mins in a day can be spared for extra studies, and I utilise this time fully.

Whenever I study these "extra" topics that I am so passionate about, I want to learn them in a way that will grow a mindset for research. For example, I do not always focus on problem solving after attending lectures on some topic, but I also formulate some problems (not numerical, but mainly theoretical), and try to find a solution by myself, or ask the concerned professor through an email. Through this, I seem to have a better grasp on the topics.

I have sometimes seen people struggle to find a topic for research. For example, if I want to do some work in quantum, then I have to know first what progress has been made till date, and only then can I think of something in the field where no progress has been made. I have heard that people take six or seven long months to find themselves a topic for PhD.

For a student wanting to do research in physics later on, how should he study from day one so that he prepares himself for a research career bit by bit?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think worrying about what topic you'll do a possible PhD in before graduating high school is putting the cart way, way before the horse.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gleem, member 587159, Vanadium 50 and 1 other person
Dr Transport said:
I think worrying about what topic you'll do a possible PhD in before graduating high school is putting the cart way, way before the horse.
I believe my question was a bit unclear. What I meant to say was, how should I study topics (any topic, physics, chemistry or maths) such that I have an advantage during research? Only doing problems and not thinking outside the Infinite Square Well might not always be helpful in research, at least that's what I feel. Can the process of how a person studies a topic, influence his research later?
 
Wrichik Basu said:
Only doing problems and not thinking outside the Infinite Square Well might not always be helpful in research
I've found that one of the better ways to start thinking outside the infinite square well early is to do projects and build things on your own. (Apologies to those folks who've seen me say this before on the PF; sorry for the repetition.)

One of the smartest people I've ever studied with and worked with was a guy named Dan back in undergrad. He is now a Fellow at Tektronix, and has a long line of research and product development credits. When I first met him in undergrad, I was impressed at how intelligent and practical he was. By the time he'd graduated high school and finished his freshman year of undergrad, he had built an 8-bit computer from logic gates (it was about the size of a shoebox), a stereo Hi-Fi receiver from discrete transistors, and several other projects from the ground-up. So he already had learned to ask the right questions when studying new subjects, and he continued that theme in his studies and later in his career. He had already placed highly in several advanced Math competitions, and at least once I remember him seeing a rubber ball bounce accidentally off of a person's head, go up and back down and hit their head again (pretty funny). He paused, and I could see him thinking about it, and a few moments later when he was done, I asked him what he was thinking. He said he just wanted to be sure he knew how he would approach solving for the motion of the person and the ball in that situation, in case it ever came up in a competition or exam. :smile:

Anyway, by the end of undergrad, I'd built a lab-quality power supply (that met UL safety requirements), a nice digital clock and enclosure, a laser light organ with 2-D deflection by voice coils with a mechanism to display patterns on the wall, and several other projects. The laser deflection project in particular stretched my early knowledge about optics, electro-mechanical systems, mechanical bandwidths, and a number of other topics. I didn't see some of those topics for another year or so in my studies, but I'd learned to "ask the right questions" of myself and my instructors when being introduced to those subjects formally.

So it will vary by subject area (Math, Physics, EE, ME, Materials, etc.), but I think you can start to get the idea that you should look for extra projects that you can work on to learn more about the subjects. In Math, look over past competition questions, and try to figure out some of the harder ones. This will help you to stretch your knowledge and expand your ability to work on harder Math problems. In Physics and Engineering, try to come up with interesting projects or experiments that you can make/build on your own, and see how far you get before stalling out and needing to learn new things to complete them.

Anyway, that's one approach to learning to think outside the box, IMO. :smile: Have fun!

Dan Knierim:
https://www.edn.com/Home/PrintView?contentItemId=4439434

https://m.eet.com/contenteetimes/images/Martin/Feature%20articles/Tektronix/Tek-DPOdev_Dan_Knierim_Equations_300x298.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi and Wrichik Basu

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K