I Is Mathpages the Best Resource for Understanding GR?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter m4r35n357
  • Start date Start date
m4r35n357
Messages
657
Reaction score
148
I have to be perfectly honest here, I haven't checked this (lack of stamina), but thought I'd post it for awareness.

From the Field Equations to the Kruskal Metric

Tyre-kicking of the highest order!
 
  • Like
Likes atyy
Physics news on Phys.org
m4r35n357 said:
I have to be perfectly honest here, I haven't checked this (lack of stamina), but thought I'd post it for awareness.

From the Field Equations to the Kruskal Metric

Tyre-kicking of the highest order!
FYI, there are a number of papers that did very rigorous derivations along this line years before math pages existed. While I generally have a good opinion of Kevin Brown (author of mathpages), there are times when he over philosophizes and over complicates things that can be treated much more simply. I think the single best free online intro to GR is Sean Carroll’s lecture notes.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and bhobba
PAllen said:
FYI, there are a number of papers that did very rigorous derivations along this line years before math pages existed. While I generally have a good opinion of Kevin Brown (author of mathpages), there are times when he over philosophizes and over complicates things that can be treated much more simply. I think the single best free online intro to GR is Sean Carroll’s lecture notes.
To put it bluntly, Carroll's notes are just too hard, and too theoretical for my taste. I think the only part I understood properly was the effective potential orbit stuff. Mathpages suits me because it is like a giant set of worked examples, which I think is necessary if you are not surrounded by professors, textbooks and other students.

Kevin Brown's range is truly colossal, free to read, and more suited to my learning level. As a parting shot, aimed at the forum in general, here are three separate articles on infinite grids of resistors . . . !
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...

Similar threads

Replies
39
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
33
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Back
Top