This webpage title could be: Understanding Differentials in Fluid Mechanics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the expression γδxδyδz in fluid mechanics, where γ represents the specific weight of a fluid and δx, δy, δz denote small differential lengths in three dimensions. Participants clarify that this expression represents the weight of a small volume element, which can be treated as constant due to its negligible size. The confusion arises from interpreting the geometric meaning of the expression and the difference between δx and dx, with δx indicating a small change in x. Ultimately, the weight of the small element is simply expressed as δw = γδxδyδz, emphasizing the intuitive nature of this physics concept.
txdw16
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hey all,

I just started a fluid mechanics class and I'm having trouble interpreting the physical meaning behind differentials in this free body diagram.

fluid-particle.jpg


For example, γδxδyδz. I know gamma is the specific weight of the block of fluid. And I know δ is the differential length in x, y, or z directions. But together as an expression what does this mean?

My thought process is:

λ=ρg

and it makes sense that the weight of the "block" of fluid is

λ*Volume

But wouldn't that look something like this:

∫∫∫λδxδyδz

If you're not integrating, then what does it mean when they're just hanging there?
Also, is there a difference between the notation δx and dx?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The δ notation usually means you are considering a very small element. So the integral is not needed because the element is so small (probably you will take the size to 0 in some specific way at the end of the calculation) that you don't need the integral since γ will not vary inside this small volume.
 
Okay thanks for the response that makes sense. But as far as the geometric meaning goes, what does γδxδyδz mean?

In my head I think "The change in specific weight in any direction".

But that phrase makes me think more along the lines of:
\frac{\partial{\gamma}}{\partial{x}}\hat{i} + \frac{\partial{\gamma}}{\partial{y}}\hat{j} + \frac{\partial{\gamma}}{\partial{z}}\hat{k}

I'm probably just confusing myself. Any insight would be appreciated
 
This is an example of "physics math" that is meant to be more intuitive than rigorous math required to analyse the situation would have been, but it is only intuitive after you have grasped its ways. ##\delta x## means a "small change in ##x##", and it may also mean ##dx## whenever that is convenient. ## \delta x \delta y \delta z ## is the volume of a (small) box with (small) sides ## \delta x, \ \delta y, \ \delta z##. And because things are as small as we need them to be, ##\lambda## does not change significantly within the box, the weight of the box is just ## \lambda \delta x \delta y \delta z ## We ignore all of the inaccuracies of this description and say that things are equal when they are approximately equal.
 
txdw16 said:
Okay thanks for the response that makes sense. But as far as the geometric meaning goes, what does γδxδyδz mean?

In my head I think "The change in specific weight in any direction".

But that phrase makes me think more along the lines of:
\frac{\partial{\gamma}}{\partial{x}}\hat{i} + \frac{\partial{\gamma}}{\partial{y}}\hat{j} + \frac{\partial{\gamma}}{\partial{z}}\hat{k}

I'm probably just confusing myself. Any insight would be appreciated

You had the correct insight in the OP, and then you started thinking too much.

The volume of the small element shown in the picture is indeed δxδyδz. We assume that because the dimensions of this element are so small, the specific weight γ can be treated as a constant. Hence, the weight of this tiny element is expressed as δw = γδxδyδz.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
I know that mass does not affect the acceleration in a simple pendulum undergoing SHM, but how does the mass on the spring that makes up the elastic pendulum affect its acceleration? Certainly, there must be a change due to the displacement from equilibrium caused by each differing mass? I am talking about finding the acceleration at a specific time on each trial with different masses and comparing them. How would they compare and why?
Back
Top