Thought experiment for using Black Holes for cmmunication

NateTG
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
2,449
Reaction score
7
Let's say that we have two planets -- planet A and planet B, 100 Lightyears apart in space. Centered directly between them is a black hole with a 25 lightyear Schwartzchild radius. (The idea is that it's 25 lightyears fromt the Schwartzschild surface to each planet.)

If someone on planet A shots a stream of electrons with velocity .99c into the black hole, then awouldn't someone on planet B be able to observe the change in the black hole in approximately 50 years by observing the charge of the black hole?

The electrons would take about 25 years to reach the black hole. Then the black hole would have observable charge. Since the internal structure of the black hole is unobservable, the charge should affect all of the black hole instananeously, so the other side would also be changed. Then the observation of the charge chage would take another 25 years to reach the other planet.

I see two potential answers:
One is that the black hole has an effective diameter of zero -- thus the distnace between the planets is actually 50 lightyears.
The other is that the charge propogates along the schwartzchild surface of the black hole at c, so that it takes less time for light to get from one planet to the other by barely missing the Schwartzschild horizon.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Originally posted by NateTG
Let's say that we have two planets -- planet A and planet B, 100 Lightyears apart in space. Centered directly between them is a black hole with a 25 lightyear Schwartzchild radius. (The idea is that it's 25 lightyears fromt the Schwartzschild surface to each planet.)

If someone on planet A shots a stream of electrons with velocity .99c into the black hole, then awouldn't someone on planet B be able to observe the change in the black hole in approximately 50 years by observing the charge of the black hole?

The electrons would take about 25 years to reach the black hole. Then the black hole would have observable charge. Since the internal structure of the black hole is unobservable, the charge should affect all of the black hole instananeously, so the other side would also be changed. Then the observation of the charge chage would take another 25 years to reach the other planet.

I see two potential answers:
One is that the black hole has an effective diameter of zero -- thus the distnace between the planets is actually 50 lightyears.
The other is that the charge propogates along the schwartzchild surface of the black hole at c, so that it takes less time for light to get from one planet to the other by barely missing the Schwartzschild horizon.
if we assume that the speed of electron is constant even when it's already inside the black hole and the escape velocity from the black hole is c therefore i think the electron should pass the whole 100 lightyears distance between the stars and therefore it will take it to come to planet be 100 years and not 50 because i don't think a black hole is a shortcut.
 
Originally posted by NateTG
... Since the internal structure of the black hole is unobservable, the charge should affect all of the black hole instananeously...

For me, your thought experiment points out the need to examine
that "fact" about black holes having no hair
or the idea that a black hole is completely characterized by three
parameters: mass, spin, and charge

I suppose that this can be true only for a BH in isolation, not interacting with environment (gaining charge, mass, angular momentum)
If the BH is in the middle of some dynamic interaction with the outside world then the event horizon can be undulating and the EM field around the hole can be changing too.

the info that the hole has acquired some charge (a steadily increasing amount if it is a steady beam of electrons) would
travel by maxwell equations I guess, anyway not instantaneously.

this is not to say that I can solve the problem presented by this thought experiment----I am merely telling you what I learn from the experiement: that a BH in the midst of some interaction (like a planetsize chunk of matter has just fallen into it, or a bag of charge, or whatever, and it is digesting the thing and maybe burping) cannot be simply described by just three numbers.

it must have more than 3 degrees of freedom IMHO

maybe someone else can give a more authoritative account
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Back
Top