Thought process improvement on Probabilities

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the challenge of applying the appropriate probability distributions, specifically the Binomial and Multinomial distributions, to solve problems involving random distributions of objects. The original problem posed was about determining the probability of a specific outcome when throwing nine balls into five containers. The participant expressed difficulty in shifting from basic Kolmogorov probability functions to using distributions effectively. The conversation highlights the importance of training one's thought process to recognize when to apply these distributions rather than relying solely on foundational principles. Ultimately, the focus is on developing a more intuitive understanding of probability distributions in problem-solving.
cdux
Messages
187
Reaction score
0
I had a problem that said "I throw nine balls randomly in five containers. What's the probability any container will have exactly five balls by the end of the process?"

The answer involved using a Binomial distribution.

Now the question is, how do I train my mind to go to the use of distributions and not basic Kolmogorov probability functions? I was spending so much time trying to find a simple answer and I was surprised it was easier with a binomial distribution. What is the right thought process to easily direct me to the use of a distribution in that problem?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
cdux said:
Now the question is, how do I train my mind to go to the use of distributions and not basic Kolmogorov probability functions?
The same way you trained your mind *not* to use the epsilon-delta definition of the derivative.

That limit concept is absolutely essential to making the concept of the derivative rigorous. That doesn't mean you need to use it to compute (for example) the derivative of exp(-x2/2). It's too much work.

The Kolmogorov axioms are similarly essential to making the concept of probability rigorous. That does not mean you should go to first principles and use those axioms to solve every probability problem.
 
Last edited:
Yes, but why should you not go there? I deal with a list of questions that may use basic principles or they may not use basic principles. I'm trying to find out why on that particular question for example I couldn't automatically think of using a distribution.
 
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...
Back
Top