Thread title changed in biology forum

  • Thread starter Thread starter nobahar
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The thread title "Homosexuality" in the biology forum was changed to "Is there any evidence for homosexuality?" but many users believe the new title is inappropriate. The original title is preferred for better indexing and search engine optimization, as one-word titles can lead to confusion with multiple similar threads. Suggestions for a more descriptive title include "Homosexuality and homosexual behaviour in animals" and "Neural basis of homosexuality." Users agree that a more specific title would enhance clarity and searchability. The request to revert to a more suitable title received support from the community.
nobahar
Messages
482
Reaction score
2
Hello!
Quick request:
Someone changed the thread 'Homosexuality' in the biology forum to 'is there any evidence for homosexuality?', everyone seems to be in agreement that the new thread title is not suitable. I don't know who changed it as I was not informed about it. May someone change it back, please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The thread title was changed to something more descriptive. One word thread titles are not good when it comes to indexing the site in a search engine (for example, there are probably many threads with the title 'homosexuality'). So, you can have it changed if you come up with something more descriptive.
 
cristo said:
there are probably many threads with the title 'homosexuality').

I had noticed that at the bottom of the page was some links to similar threads, they too had the title homosexuality.

Perhaps a better title would be "Homosexuality and homosexual behaviour in animals"
 
Thanks for the responses.
Someone recommended Neural basis of homosexuality, or something similar, which I think may be quite good.
 
nobahar said:
Thanks for the responses.
Someone recommended Neural basis of homosexuality, or something similar, which I think may be quite good.

i will change it, thanks
 
Thankyou.
 
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...
Back
Top