Three-Body Problem with Symmetry: Finite Masses and Spring Constants Considered

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Hans Stricker
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the three-body problem involving two bodies of mass M and one body of mass m, connected by linear springs. The analysis reveals that while trivial solutions exist for infinite mass scenarios or zero spring constants, the symmetric nature of the problem allows for potential closed or approximate solutions even when considering finite mass ratios. The Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formalisms are highlighted as effective methods for deriving solutions, emphasizing the importance of conservation of momentum in understanding the dynamics of the system.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrangian mechanics
  • Familiarity with Hamiltonian mechanics
  • Knowledge of spring constant concepts in physics
  • Basic principles of conservation of momentum
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore Lagrangian mechanics in detail
  • Study Hamiltonian mechanics and its applications
  • Investigate the implications of spring constants on dynamic systems
  • Research advanced topics in the three-body problem
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mechanical engineers, and students studying classical mechanics, particularly those interested in complex dynamical systems and the three-body problem.

Hans Stricker
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Consider the problem of three bodies two of which having mass M, one of them having mass m. Body m is in the middle between the other two, coupled to them by two equal linear springs in rest. Now fix the two bodies M and move body m for a small amount perpendicular to the connection line. Now let loose the three of them.

The solution is trivial when we assume m to be finite and M to be infinite (or vice versa), or when the spring constant is 0.

But the problem is so symmetric, that there might be hope to get a closed or approximate solution even for finite m >> M, M >> m, or even M = m?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Definitely. Its a trivial problem in the lagrangian or hamiltonian formalism. If you are not familiar with those, think about conservation of momentum---and I think you can still get the right answer (and definitely the right idea of the answer).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K