Three masses connected by pulleys

  • Thread starter Thread starter new90
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pulleys
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mechanics of three masses connected by pulleys, specifically analyzing the motion of mass A and its effect on masses B and the 1 kg block. Participants clarify that when mass A descends by 1 unit, mass B ascends by √2 units, and the 1 kg block ascends by 0.5 units. The conversation emphasizes the importance of using the Pythagorean theorem and velocity components to derive these relationships accurately. The principle of virtual work is also mentioned as a method to solve for the weights of the masses in static equilibrium.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic mechanics and pulley systems
  • Familiarity with the Pythagorean theorem
  • Knowledge of velocity components in physics
  • Concept of virtual work in static equilibrium
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the Pythagorean theorem in pulley systems
  • Learn about velocity components and their calculations in mechanics
  • Explore the principle of virtual work in static equilibrium problems
  • Review static equilibrium equations, including ΣF_x = 0
USEFUL FOR

Students studying mechanics, physics enthusiasts, and anyone interested in solving problems related to pulley systems and static equilibrium.

  • #31
ok so what I did was follw what harupex said about the distance = if A moves down 1 units 1kg box will move up 0.5 unit then i used the vitual work method =Σfi times virtual distance = 0 this is =10N(because the force of gravity)times .5unit - 10aN(a = the box of the center)times 1 unit = 0(is minus because the forces are in different directions)this equal to = 5N =10aNewtons and the answer is 5N/10N = a = .5N and the final answer is 5 kg-wt but the answer in the book is 1.4kg wt
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
new90 said:
ok so what I did was follw what harupex said about the distance = if A moves down 1 units 1kg box will move up 0.5 unit then i used the vitual work method =Σfi times virtual distance = 0 this is =10N(because the force of gravity)times .5unit - 10aN(a = the box of the center)times 1 unit = 0(is minus because the forces are in different directions)this equal to = 5N =10aNewtons and the answer is 5N/10N = a = .5N and the final answer is 5 kg-wt but the answer in the book is 1.4kg wt
I cannot find in this thread a complete statement of the problem, so I don't know what you are trying to calculate. Are you trying to find the weights A and B for equilibrium?

I note you make no reference there to box B. That should feature in your virtual work calculation.
In order to solve the problem you will also need to consider horizontal equilibrium.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: new90, SammyS and etotheipi
  • #33
ok i will make another tread
 
  • #34
If you are making another thread to start over on this problem, that is the wrong way to go about it. Deal with the shortcomings in this thread by adding content here.

If you are making another thread to start a new problem and are giving up on this problem, don't advertise your new thread here. That's tacky. Just tell us you are giving up on the problem.
 
  • #35
the system is in static equilibrium .Use he principle of virtual work to find the weight A and B.Neglect the weight of the strings and the friction in the pulley

1588344473995.png
 

Attachments

  • 1588344388048.png
    1588344388048.png
    7.2 KB · Views: 137
  • #36
new90 said:
the system is in static equilibrium .Use he principle of virtual work to find the weight A and B.Neglect the weight of the strings and the friction in the pulley

View attachment 261873
Ok, so if A moves down one unit what does each of the other two masses do? What is the total work done on the system?
As I mentioned, you also need to consider another direction. Maybe think about A moving sideways. What is the work done now?

(For this problem, seems to me that writing the force balance equations is simpler than using virtual work.)

And this time, please show all your steps as equations, not as vague descriptions.
 
  • #37
i give up i will try this problem at some oint in the future
 
  • #38
new90 said:
i give up i will try this problem at some oint in the future

If the virtual work approach is tripping you up, see if you can solve it using the good old static equilibrium approach. ##\sum F_x = 0##, etc.
 
  • #39
thanks but I am tired of this problem
 
  • #40
Can I have the complete problem statement please?
 
  • #41
archaic said:
Can I have the complete problem statement please?
Post #35.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: archaic

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K