I Three Plus Anti-symmetric Particles

JohnH
Messages
63
Reaction score
6
So I understand that fermions are anti-symmetric under exchange, but in the contexts I've seen this explained they were always talking about two particles, or at least two wavefunctions. I'm curious how this works when there are three or more particles. Is any two given pairs of those 3+ particles anti-symmetric under exchange or is it more systematic? Or is it that there's essentially one wavefunction for all the particles (quanta of energy) in one spin and another wavefunction for all the quanta of energy in the other spin such that it's just those two wavefunctions that are anti-symmetric under exchange?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
JohnH said:
So I understand that fermions are anti-symmetric under exchange, but in the contexts I've seen this explained they were always talking about two particles, or at least two wavefunctions. I'm curious how this works when there are three or more particles.
The wave function for three electrons is covered here:

https://galileo.phys.virginia.edu/classes/752.mf1i.spring03/IdenticalParticlesRevisited.htm

The total wavefunction must reverse sign under the exchange of any two particles.
JohnH said:
Is any two given pairs of those 3+ particles anti-symmetric under exchange or is it more systematic? Or is it that there's essentially one wavefunction for all the particles (quanta of energy) in one spin and another wavefunction for all the quanta of energy in the other spin such that it's just those two wavefunctions that are anti-symmetric under exchange?
I can't make any sense of this part of your question.
 
  • Like
Likes JohnH and topsquark
PeroK said:
I can't make any sense of this part of your question.
Yeah, just trying to answer my own question last minute. Probably better off waiting for an answer. Anyway, thank you for it.
 
The wave functions of indistinguishable fermions must be antisymmetric under exchange of any pair of arguments, ##(\vec{x}_j,\sigma_j##, where ##\vec{x}_j## is the postition and ##\sigma_j## the spin-##z##-component (##\sigma_j\in \{-s,-s+1,\ldots,s-1,s \}##, where ##s## is a half-integer positive number, ##s \in \{1/2,3/2,\ldots \}##), i.e., if ##\psi(t,\vec{x}_1,\sigma_1;\vec{x}_2,\sigma_2;\ldots; \vec{x}_N,\sigma_N)## is an ##N##-particle fermionic wave function, then it's antisymmetric by exchanging any pair ##(\vec{x}_i,\sigma_i)## and ##(\vec{x}_j,\sigma_j)##.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I am not sure if this falls under classical physics or quantum physics or somewhere else (so feel free to put it in the right section), but is there any micro state of the universe one can think of which if evolved under the current laws of nature, inevitably results in outcomes such as a table levitating? That example is just a random one I decided to choose but I'm really asking about any event that would seem like a "miracle" to the ordinary person (i.e. any event that doesn't seem to...

Similar threads

Back
Top