Time dependent electric force at large distance

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on developing time-dependent equations to simulate the positions of two electrically charged particles in space, where one particle is stationary. The user is attempting to account for the non-constant force between the particles as they move closer together, which complicates the use of standard kinematic equations. They explore the need for a vector differential equation to represent the relationship between force, acceleration, and position over time, specifically addressing the challenges of calculating distance continuously as the particles move. The conversation highlights the importance of breaking down the force into its vector components and integrating acceleration to find new positions iteratively. Ultimately, the user seeks clarification on how to express the distance between the two objects as a continuous function of time.
Shintao
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I need some help with time dependent equations. I have two electrically charged particles in space that are at large distances. How would I write a time dependent equation to simulate there positions at give times. I know there initial positions and there initial velocities. And for simplicity one object is unmovable. This is what I have:

f = \frac{kq_{1}q_{2}}{r^2}

a = \frac{f}{m}

x = x_{0} + v_{0}t + \frac{at^2}{2}

But, the force between the two objects is non-constant because as they get closer to each other force increases rapidly. So do I use the yank instead of force. But, that creates the problem of making the equation distance dependent. I don't need the force at given distances. I need the force a given times based on distances.


for those that know C++:

f = cos(atan2(particle2.y - particle1.y, particle2.x - particle1.x)) * COULOMB_CONSTANT * -particle2.charge * particle1.charge / (_hypot(particle2.y - particle1.y, particle2.x - particle1.x));

a = f / particle1.mass;

x = particle1.initial_x + particle1.initial_velocity.x * time + a * pow(time, 2) / 2;

It seems to me that the force should be time dependent because the distance between the two particles is time dependent. I need some calculus help. I think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Shintao said:
x = x_{0} + v_{0}t + \frac{at^2}{2}
First off, this equation does not apply. This is not a general equation, but rather an equation that is only valid for the special case of constant acceleration. And of course, in your situation you already know that the force is not constant.

Shintao said:
How would I write a time dependent equation to simulate there positions at give times. I know there initial positions and there initial velocities. And for simplicity one object is unmovable. This is what I have:

f = \frac{kq_{1}q_{2}}{r^2}

a = \frac{f}{m}
Here you are dealing with electrical forces, but do you know of any other forces with the same form for their equation? If so, do you know the solution for that equation?

By the way, I don't know your level of math, but this is a vector differential equation that would probably be covered after 3 semesters of calculus or more.

r'' = C/(r |r|)

If you don't know how to solve that, then you are going to have to look up the solution somewhere else.
 
I looked up differiental equations. When you say vector differiental equation, are you referring to the fact that I have to break the force into its three respective vectors(x, y, z). If that is what you mean, I understand how to pull apart the force vector into the respective parts.

r'' = \frac{C}{r|r|}

I need some help breaking this down. Correct me if I'm wrong. 2nd derivative of r = C/(r|r|). What does C stand for? And wouldn't r have to relate to time and position?
 
Shintao said:
I looked up differiental equations. When you say vector differiental equation, are you referring to the fact that I have to break the force into its three respective vectors(x, y, z). If that is what you mean, I understand how to pull apart the force vector into the respective parts.

r'' = \frac{C}{r|r|}

I need some help breaking this down. Correct me if I'm wrong. 2nd derivative of r = C/(r|r|). What does C stand for? And wouldn't r have to relate to time and position?
C is just a constant. In this case C = k q1 q2/m1. But if you were dealing with gravity then C = G m1 m2/m1

I should have been more explicit r is actually r(t) = (x(t),y(t),z(t)), a vector function of time indicating the position at a time t.
 
Last edited:
I get what you are saying. U were just short-hand writting with C in the equation. If I can figure this out it should relate to most of the inverse-squared laws in physics.

r is the three dimensional displacement of the object(electron, e) or the stationary object(proton, p)

For simpicity I just want to use 2 dimensions(x, y)
I start with time(t) = 0;
d = distance between e and p
m = slope
C = k * q1 * q2

d = \sqrt{(e_{x} - p_{x})^2 + (e_{y} - p_{y})^2}

m = \frac{e_{y} - p_{y}}{e_{x} - p_{x}}

F_{x} = \cos{(\arctan{(m))} * \frac{C}{d^2}}

a = \frac{F}{m}}

Then integrate a twice for t to get the new position along the x axis. Then do the same for the y axis. Then start over with the new position. But, since position is related to the distance between the two objects how do I write a continuous equation for the distance between the two objects. d is what I don't know how to do continously.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top