How does calculus of variations handle explicit time dependence in Lagrangian?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on how calculus of variations addresses explicit time dependence in Lagrangian mechanics. It clarifies that when a Lagrangian includes explicit time dependence, the term ∂L/∂t δt does not appear in the Least Action Principle because the endpoints of the interval are not varied. The derivation of the Lagrange equations remains valid, as shown by the equation δL = ∂L/∂x δx + ∂L/∂ẋ δẋ, which leads to the conclusion that ∂L/∂x = d/dt ∂L/∂ẋ. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the chain rule in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrangian mechanics
  • Familiarity with the calculus of variations
  • Knowledge of the Least Action Principle
  • Basic proficiency in differential calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Lagrange equations in time-dependent systems
  • Explore the implications of the Hamilton principle in Lagrangian mechanics
  • Learn about the chain rule in the context of variational calculus
  • Investigate examples of explicit time dependence in physical systems
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mathematicians, and engineering students interested in advanced mechanics, particularly those studying Lagrangian dynamics and the calculus of variations.

DuckAmuck
Messages
238
Reaction score
40
If a Lagrangian has explicit time dependence due to the potential changing, or thrust being applied to the object in question, how does calculus of variations handle this?

It's easy to get the Lagrange equations from:

δL = ∂L/∂x δx + ∂L/∂ δ

What is not clear is how this works when t is an explicit variable in L

δL = ∂L/∂x δx + ∂L/∂ δ + ∂L/∂t δt

How does this still result in:

∂L/∂x = d/dt ∂L/∂ẋ ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
if you mean the standard Least Action Principle then this principle holds for time dependent Lagrangians by the same way as for time independent Lagrangians
 
wrobel said:
if you mean the standard Least Action Principle then this principle holds for time dependent Lagrangians by the same way as for time independent Lagrangians

Can you show why? How is the term ∂L/∂t δt handled in Least Action?
 
DuckAmuck said:
How is the term ∂L/∂t δt handled in Least Action?
the is no such a term in Least Action because you do not vary ends of the interval
 
Just calculate this: $$\frac{d}{d\epsilon}\Big|_{\epsilon=0}\int_{t_1}^{t_2}L(t,q(t)+\epsilon h(t),\dot q(t)+\epsilon \dot h(t))dt$$ for ##h(t)## such that ##h(t_i)=0,\quad i=1,2##
you will not get that term
 
That term comes from the chain rule of δL
I have seen the least action principle shown as 0 = δS = ∫δL dt, which I guess is misleading.
I have seen the form you have, and that makes more sense. You are explicitly minimizing with respect to epsilon.
 
By the way the Action functional is not compelled to attain a minimum for real motion, real motion is just a critical point of this functional . It can attain maximum for real motion
 
Last edited:
DuckAmuck said:
That term comes from the chain rule of δL
I have seen the least action principle shown as 0 = δS = ∫δL dt, which I guess is misleading.
I have seen the form you have, and that makes more sense. You are explicitly minimizing with respect to epsilon.
By definition time is not varied in the usual Hamilton principle!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
655
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K