Time evolution of a particle in momentum space

Foracle
Messages
29
Reaction score
8
Homework Statement
At time t=0, the wave function of a particle is
##\Psi(x,0)=(\frac{\alpha}{\pi})^{\frac{1}{4}}e^{ik_{0}x-ax^{2}/2}##
##\alpha## and ##k_{0}## are real constants

What is the wavefunction at time t in momentum space, ##\tilde{\Psi}(k,t)##?
Relevant Equations
##\tilde{\Psi}(k)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty }^{\infty}dxe^{ikx}\Psi(x)##

##U(t,t_{0})=e^{-\frac{i}{\hbar}\hat{H}t} = e^{-\frac{i}{\hbar}\frac{\hat{p^2}t}{2m}} ##
Since it asks for the time evolution of the wavefunction in the momentum space, I write : ##\tilde{\Psi}(k,t) = < p|U(t,t_{0})|\Psi> = < U^\dagger(t,t_{0})p|\Psi>##

Since ##U(t,t_{0})^\dagger = e^{\frac{i}{\hbar}\frac{\hat{p^2}t}{2m}}##, the above equation becomes
##\tilde{\Psi}(k,t) = e^{\frac{-i}{\hbar}\frac{p^2t}{2m}} < p|\Psi> = e^{\frac{-i}{\hbar}\frac{p^2t}{2m}} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty }^{\infty}dxe^{ikx}\Psi(x)##

Evaluate this with ##\Psi(x)=(\frac{\alpha}{\pi})^{\frac{1}{4}}e^{ik_{0}x-ax^{2}/2}##, I end up getting :
##\tilde{\Psi}(k,t) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{a}}(\frac{\alpha}{\pi})^{1/4}e^{-\frac{(k-k_{0})^2}{2a}}e^{\frac{-i}{\hbar}\frac{p^2t}{2m}}##

Since ##p=\hbar k##,
##\tilde{\Psi}(k,t) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{a}}(\frac{\alpha}{\pi})^{1/4}e^{-\frac{(k-k_{0})^2}{2a}}e^{\frac{-i}{\hbar}\frac{\hbar^2k^2t}{2m}}##

Is this the right way to solve this problem?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your work looks good to me except for some sign issues.
Foracle said:
Relevant Equations:: ##\tilde{\Psi}(k)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty }^{\infty}dxe^{ikx}\Psi(x)##
Check to see if the factor of ##e^{ikx}## in the integrand should actually be ##e^{-ikx}##. With ##e^{-ikx}##, then I think your result for ##\tilde{\Psi}(k, t)## is correct. But, if you use your way of writing ##\tilde{\Psi}(k)##, then I believe you would get a result for ##\tilde{\Psi}(k, t)## with a factor of ##\large e^{-\frac{(k+k_0)^2}{2a}}## instead of ##\large e^{-\frac{(k-k_0)^2}{2a}}##.

(But maybe I'm the one who's getting the signs wrong. :oldsmile:)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top