Time-independent wave function formula

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on constructing a time-independent wavefunction for a particle in a one-dimensional box, emphasizing the need to incorporate probabilities of obtaining specific energy states. Participants highlight the importance of normalizing wavefunctions and using the Hamiltonian operator to calculate probabilities for each energy state. A proposed wavefunction is presented, which is a linear combination of eigenfunctions, indicating that it can yield the same energies from different wavefunctions due to their orthonormal properties. The uniqueness of the wavefunction is questioned, with the understanding that while it is a unique solution to the specific square well, different combinations can produce the same energy values. Overall, the conversation underscores the complexities of quantum mechanics and the significance of orthonormality in wavefunction construction.
droedujay
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Construct wavefunction with given energies and probabilities of obtaining energies in a 1-D box from 0 to a

Homework Equations


3. The Attempt at a Solution

I know the general form of a time-independent wavefunction but I don't know what to do with the probabilities of obtaining energies. Is there a formula for this?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There are lots of places you can find detailed explanations of this problem - it is one of the most common quantum models out there. Try doing a Google search for "infinite square well."
 
I looked but I could not find anything on probabilities of obtaining Energies. I know about psi star psi being the probability of finding a particle in a specific region but I do not have any material on probability of obtaining Energies.
 
droedujay said:
I know about psi star psi being the probability of finding a particle in a specific region

My quantum is a little shaky, but I think <\psi_{n}^{*}|\psi_{n}> is indeed the position operator, which is also written |\psi_{n}(x)|^{2}. You need to normalize your psi functions so that each \psi_{n}(x) has the correct coefficient: since the particle has to be somewhere in the box, you know that the integral over the whole region must be 1. To find the probability of a certain state, you put the Hamiltonian operator into the Bra-Ket: <\psi_{n}^{*}|\hat{H}|\psi_{n}> So once you have the correct coefficients for your set of \psi_{n}(x) functions, you can do <\psi_{n}^{*}|\hat{H}|\psi_{n}> for each one to find the probability of the particle being in that state, with that energy.
 
Last edited:
I found out the Coefficient expansion theorem and constructed the following wavefunction:

Ψ(x,0) = 1/sqrt(2)*φ1 + sqrt(2/5)*φ3 + 1/sqrt(10)*φ5
where φn = sqrt(2/a)*sin(n*pi*x/a)

Is this unique why or why not? I'm thinking that it has something to do with all odd Energies.
 
Beyond what I wrote before I am out of my depth, but I'll try. I believe the energies are odd because the well runs from 0 to a and not -a/2 to a/2; in the latter case I think you would have even energies or cosines. As to the uniqueness question, I would guess that the wavefunction itself is a unique solution to your particular square well, but it is of course a linear combination of eigenfunctions so I don't know how that affects uniqueness. I would imagine performing the Hamiltonian on completely different wavefunctions could return the same energies, so the energy values would not necessarily be unique. Is that what you mean?
 
I think that it has something to do with the fact that this wavefunction is orthonormal.
 
I believe the orthonormal bit refers to the fact that each eigenfunction that makes up your wavefunction (i.e. \psi_{1} , \psi_{3} , \psi_{5} , etc.) is linearly independent of each of the others, and therefore said to be orthonormal, in the same way that the X, Y and Z-axes are independent and orthonormal, for example.
 
I appreciate all the help on this problem. I think I got this one down. Can you check out my other forum "QM wavefunctions" and see if you could help out there too.
 
Back
Top