Time & Probability: Relativistic Bohmian Mechanics

  • Thread starter Thread starter atyy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    spacetime
atyy
Science Advisor
Messages
15,170
Reaction score
3,379
http://arxiv.org/abs/1309.0400v2
Time and probability: From classical mechanics to relativistic Bohmian mechanics
H. Nikolic
(Submitted on 2 Sep 2013 (v1), last revised 30 Sep 2013 (this version, v2))
Bohmian mechanics can be generalized to a relativistic theory without preferred foliation, with a price of introducing a puzzling concept of spacetime probability conserved in a scalar time. We explain how analogous concept appears naturally in classical statistical mechanics of relativistic particles, with scalar time being identified with the proper time along particle trajectories. The conceptual understanding of relativistic Bohmian mechanics is significantly enriched by this classical insight. In particular, the analogy between classical and Bohmian mechanics suggests the interpretation of Bohmian scalar time as a quantum proper time different from the classical one, the two being related by a nonlocal scale factor calculated from the wave function. In many cases of practical interest, including the macroscopic measuring apparatus, the fundamental spacetime probability explains the more familiar space probability as an emergent approximate description. Requiring that the quantum proper time in the classical limit should reduce to the classical proper time, we propose that only massive particles have Bohmian trajectories. An analysis of the macroscopic measuring apparatus made up of massive particles restores agreement with the predictions of standard quantum theory.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm still reading the paper, but since I know the author hangs out here, I hope he wouldn't mind me asking some questions before I've hardly started :)

If "only massive particles have Bohmian trajectories", what would be the interpretation of the photon trajectories that lie behind the conception of this experiment? http://scienceblogs.com/principles/2011/06/03/watching-photons-interfere-obs/
 
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'
A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
Back
Top