I Time to Form Black Hole? | Observer Slows Time at Event Horizon

Cobalt101
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Is it correct that, from the perspective of an observer, time slows down and ultimately stops at the event horizon of a black hole, implying that no black holes have had time to form in the universe ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Cobalt101 said:
Is it correct that, from the perspective of an observer, time slows down and ultimately stops at the event horizon of a black hole, implying that no black holes have had time to form in the universe ?

No. A massive object only takes a finite time to collapse to a black hole, according to an observer falling in with the collapse; and an observer falling into a black hole that already exists only takes a finite time by his own clock to reach the hole's horizon.
 
PeterDonis said:
No. A massive object only takes a finite time to collapse to a black hole, according to an observer falling in with the collapse; and an observer falling into a black hole that already exists only takes a finite time by his own clock to reach the hole's horizon.
Thanks - but the observer I was referring to was not falling in with the object, but rather was watching from a distance. So in particular if a black hole is formed by a collapsing star, from the perspective of the rest of the universe does the black hole ever form? (I understand that from the perspective of the collapsing star it only takes a finite time).
 
I think the observer would see what had been the star becoming increasingly red shifted until it was no longer visible.
However if it is gravitationally bound, say in a binary system, it could be detected indirectly that way, and possibly there might be a hot and visible accretion disk of remnant material surrounding the event horizon of what now is a black hole.
 
Last edited:
Cobalt101 said:
if a black hole is formed by a collapsing star, from the perspective of the rest of the universe does the black hole ever form?

There is no such thing as "from the perspective of the rest of the universe". The black hole is a feature of the global spacetime geometry; either it is there or it isn't. If the collapsing object forms a horizon in a finite time, or an infalling observer reaches the horizon in a finite time, then the black hole is there. The fact that the distant observer can't see it doesn't change that.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...

Similar threads

Back
Top