1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Time to travel at relativistic speed

  1. Feb 17, 2010 #1
    I have a relatively simple problem that I'm having trouble with.
    A ship is going at 0.90 c, over a distance of 80 light years. In my text the method for determining the time spent traveling is:

    80 years + (0.1 * 80) = 88 years
    This method seems logical, at 0.9 of the speed of light this trip should take 80 years plus that missing 0.1 of the speed of light.

    I tried t = d/v :
    t = 80 years / (0.9 light years per year)
    t = 88.888889

    I'm not sure what is going on, I see no logical error with either approach. Any help is appreciated.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 17, 2010 #2

    Doc Al

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    This does not make sense to me. This was in your textbook?

    You are going slower than lightspeed by a factor of 1/.9 = 1.111..., not 1.10. So it should take you 80 years + 0.111...*80 = 88.88...

    This makes sense. (Note that it's equivalent to what I said above.)
     
  4. Feb 17, 2010 #3
    Thanks! I thought I was right, it just messed me up that the textbook was wrong.
     
  5. Feb 17, 2010 #4

    vela

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Education Advisor

    Did your textbook say it was equal to 88 years or approximately equal to 88 years?

    Recall the sum of a geometric series:

    [tex]1+x+x^2+\hdots = \frac{1}{1-x}[/tex]

    If x is small, you can use the approximation

    [tex]\frac{1}{1-x}\cong 1+x[/tex]

    where you truncate the series after one term without introducing much error. That may be what your book was doing. If it says the time was exactly 88 years, though, it's wrong.
     
  6. Feb 17, 2010 #5
    No, the textbook introduces the method with an example question, exactly as I wrote above, with 80 + (0.1*80).
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook