Timescale of the biological pump?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the timescale of the biological pump within the carbon cycle, highlighting that while carbon is recycled to the surface over approximately 1,000 years, the biological pump's timescale is less clear. One report suggests a range from 45 days to 5 years, raising questions about the accuracy of this data. The conversation confirms that the biological cycle is influenced by various factors, including diurnal and seasonal cycles driven by organisms like cyanobacteria and plants. The carbon cycle encompasses multiple components, with timescales varying from daily and yearly to geological periods related to plate tectonics.
Kior
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I'm tying to find any clue about the timescale of the biological pump. That the carbon is recycled to the surface ca. 1,000 years is clear but the timescale of the biological pump seems hard to find. There is an report I saw when I was surfing the internet saying that the timescale can range from 45 days to 5 years which I find is a little shocking. Does it truly vary that much, or there is something wrong about the data?
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
Are you referring to the carbon cycle?
 
stedwards said:
Are you referring to the carbon cycle?
Yes!
 
It is a good practice to save the references to be handy at a question.

Here is a good description of the carbon cycle: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_cycle . As you can see, it has many components from geology and biology. The biological cycle is of course dominated by diurnal and seasonal cycles, as cyanobacteria and plants affect it so much. So the timescale is daily, yearly and so on up to geological scales of plate tectonics (supercontinent cycle).
 
M 7.6 - 73 km ENE of Misawa, Japan https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us6000rtdt/executive 2025-12-08 14:15:11 (UTC) 40.960°N 142.185°E 53.1 km depth It was however fairly deep (53.1 km depth) as compared to the Great Tohoku earthquake in which the sea floor was displaced. I don't believe a tsunami would be significant. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us6000rtdt/region-info

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K