Tips for understanding elementary combinatorics

AI Thread Summary
Understanding elementary combinatorics can be challenging due to the variety of problem types, such as permutations and combinations with or without repetition. Many learners find it difficult to solve novel problems without prior exposure to similar examples, which is a common experience in this subject. To improve, breaking down problems into paradigm cases can help, allowing for better comparison and understanding of different scenarios. Additionally, developing a systematic approach to enumerating cases can aid in tackling new problems by focusing on specific choices and their sequences. Regular practice with diverse problems is essential for mastering combinatorial concepts.
Magenta55
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi folks, can you guys share your experience and tips for understanding this subject?

I find the sheer amount of problems and their novelty very difficult to reconcile. I mean I understand the definitions and theorems well and can usually apply them in straight forward cases, but the many variations of problems is causing me trouble. For instance, we can have permutations, permutations of several cases, combinations without repetition, combinations with repetition, or even a mixture of these cases.

I have been fine with other topics that are not algorithmic in nature, for instance, it's easier for me to prove elementary topics in mathematics, even if the problems are novel. But when it comes to combinatorics, I can't solve a truly novel problem correctly the first time around. My problem is, I can only solve problems of similar types only after I have been exposed to how to solve them. Is this normal in this subject? Is the only remedy solving more problems?

Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
With the diversity of problems you should break things down into paradigm cases and then, while reading a given example see to which case it matches up.
Examples: Drawing colored balls out of a bag i. with replacement, ii. without replacement. This is a standard paradigm problem and you can compare it to say a problem about forming committees out of various political parties in congress, or formulating meals out of various food groups, etc.

[edit] As to how to approach novel combinatorial problems, when it is an example of enumerating all cases, devise a procedure by which you would select a most specific case and consider the sequence of choices you must make. Count choices at each stage then multiply (if they are parallel choices).

Placing 5 cards from a deck in a row. You must choose the first card (52 choices) then the 2nd card (51 remaining choices)... and so on.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top