To locate the centre of gravity of a rod

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the center of gravity of a heavy rod with non-uniform density, balancing on a peg with weights suspended from either end. Two scenarios are analyzed: one with a weight of 2W from end A and another with 3W from end B, both maintaining equal distances from the peg. Through the use of moments and the introduction of a dimensionless constant representing the weight ratio, participants derive equations to express the center of mass in terms of the rod's length and the weight ratio. The final goal is to show that the center of gravity lies between (2/5)L and (1/2)L from end A, which is achieved by analyzing the derived equations. The collaborative effort highlights the importance of rephrasing variables to simplify the problem-solving process.
gnits
Messages
137
Reaction score
46
Homework Statement
To locate the centre of gravity of a rod
Relevant Equations
moments
Could I please ask for a help on how to attack this question?

A heavy rod AB of length L can be made to balance across a small smooth peg C when a weight of 2W is suspended from A. Alternatively, it can be made to balance across the peg with a weight of 3W suspended from B. If the distance AC in the first case is the same as the distance BC in the second, show that the distance of the centre of gravity of the rod from A lies between (2/5)L and (1/2)L.

Here is my diagram for the two cases.

cases'.png

(I have called the weight of the rod ω)

In each diagram I have labelled ω as acting at the same point, but not at the centre point of AB, as I take it from this question that the rod is not of uniform density.

Well, if I take moments about C in the first case I get:

2Wd=ω*x1 giving x1 = 2Wd/ω

So the distance of the centre of gravity of the rod from A is:

d + x1 = d + 2Wd/ω.

Well, I can do the same for the second case giving distance of centre of gravity of the rod from A as:

L - d - x2 = L - d - 3Wd/ω

But I don't seem to be heading anywhere helpful!

Thanks for any pointer towards a solution,
Mitch.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem is telling you that the actual center of mass of the rod is located between 40% and 50% of L, when measured from end A.
 
gnits said:
Homework Statement:: To locate the centre of gravity of a rod
Relevant Equations:: moments

Could I please ask for a help on how to attack this question?

A heavy rod AB of length L can be made to balance across a small smooth peg C when a weight of 2W is suspended from A. Alternatively, it can be made to balance across the peg with a weight of 3W suspended from B. If the distance AC in the first case is the same as the distance BC in the second, show that the distance of the centre of gravity of the rod from A lies between (2/5)L and (1/2)L.

Here is my diagram for the two cases.

View attachment 293869
(I have called the weight of the rod ω)

In each diagram I have labelled ω as acting at the same point, but not at the centre point of AB, as I take it from this question that the rod is not of uniform density.

Well, if I take moments about C in the first case I get:

2Wd=ω*x1 giving x1 = 2Wd/ω

So the distance of the centre of gravity of the rod from A is:

d + x1 = d + 2Wd/ω.

Well, I can do the same for the second case giving distance of centre of gravity of the rod from A as:

L - d - x2 = L - d - 3Wd/ω

But I don't seem to be heading anywhere helpful!

Thanks for any pointer towards a solution,
Mitch.
It's a tricky problem. A useful idea is the introduce the dimensionless constant ##\mu = \frac{W}{w}##, which is the ratio of the weight of the rod and the the other unknown weight ##W##.

The position of the CoM of the rod must depend on this ratio.

The variable you must eliminate is ##d##, leaving the distance from A to the CoM in terms of ##L## and ##\mu##.

I also suggest you need a symbol for this distance from A to the CoM. E.g. ##a##.
 
PeroK said:
It's a tricky problem. A useful idea is the introduce the dimensionless constant ##\mu = \frac{W}{w}##, which is the ratio of the weight of the rod and the the other unknown weight ##W##.

The position of the CoM of the rod must depend on this ratio.

The variable you must eliminate is ##d##, leaving the distance from A to the CoM in terms of ##L## and ##\mu##.

I also suggest you need a symbol for this distance from A to the CoM. E.g. ##a##.
Thank you very much for your reply. I would never have thought of that approach. So here is my previous diagram, with 'a' added:
cases'.png

I can combine my previously derived equations with your suggested terminology to give:

(am using u for the symbol 'mu')

a = d(1 + 2u)

and

a = L - d(1 + 3u)

and I eliminate d from these to give:

a = L - a * (1+3u)/(1+2u)

(Call this "Equation 1")

and can arrange this for a like so:

a = L(1 + 2u)/(2 + 5u)

(Call this "Equation 2")

So, tantalizingly, I can see that from "Equation 2" 'a' is not defined when u = -2/5 and from "Equation 1" 'a' is not defined when u = -1/2

I can't yet though see how to relate this to the required answer - required answer being that the distance of COG from A >(2/5)L and <(1/2)L

EDIT:
OK so looking at "Equation 2". I need 0 < a < L so I need:

0 < (1 + 2u)/(2 + 5u) < 1

Solving 0 < (1 + 2u)/(2 + 5u) leads to:

-1/2 > u > -2/5

and solving (1 + 2u)/(2 + 5u) < 1 leads to:

-2/5 > u > -1/3

Remembering that u = W/ω I can't yet see how to get from these limits on W/ω to limits for distance of COG from A.

I'll keep looking,
Thanks for any further help,
Mitch.
 
Last edited:
gnits said:
Thank you very much for your reply. I would never have thought of that approach. So here is my previous diagram, with 'a' added:View attachment 293930
I can combine my previously derived equations with your suggested terminology to give:

(am using u for the symbol 'mu')

a = d(1 + 2u)

and

a = L - d(1 + 3u)

and I eliminate d from these to give:

a = L - a * (1+3u)/(1+2u)

(Call this "Equation 1")

and can arrange this for a like so:

a = L(1 + 2u)/(2 + 5u)

(Call this "Equation 2")
Once you have equation 2 you are nearly finished. ##u = \frac{W}{w}## is the ratio of the weights and can take any positive value. You only need to calculate the maximum and minimum for ##a##.

gnits said:
So, tantalizingly, I can see that from "Equation 2" 'a' is not defined when u = -2/5 and from "Equation 1" 'a' is not defined when u = -1/2
##u## cannot be negative as it's a ratio of weights/masses.
 
PeroK said:
Once you have equation 2 you are nearly finished. ##u = \frac{W}{w}## is the ratio of the weights and can take any positive value. You only need to calculate the maximum and minimum for ##a##.##u## cannot be negative as it's a ratio of weights/masses.

I see it!

I would never have gotten it without your help. In particular, setting the equations in terms of W/ω, I don't see how I would ever of thought of that.

Thank you very much indeed.

Mitch.

Source https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/to-locate-the-centre-of-gravity-of-a-rod.1010047/
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban and PeroK
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top