Today I Learned

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
Today I learned that cleaning a white hat can be done with bleach cleaner, but it’s important to rinse it before wearing it again. I also discovered that "oyster veneering," a woodworking technique from the late 1600s, is experiencing a minor revival despite its labor-intensive nature. Additionally, I learned that the factorial of 23 (23!) equals 25,852,016,738,884,976,640,000, which interestingly has 23 digits, a unique coincidence among factorials. I found out that medical specialists often spend less than 10 minutes with patients, and that watching TV can contribute to weight gain. Other insights included the fact that a kiss can transfer around 80 million microbes, and that bureaucracy can sometimes hinder employment opportunities. The discussion also touched on various trivia, such as the emotional sensitivity of barn owls and the complexities of gravitational lensing around black holes.
  • #3,391
fresh_42 said:
As long as nobody manages to ask Mockford, [...]
Hmm. The only Mockford I know is one "Brendan Mockford", a tall blonde handsome athletic guy 1 year ahead of me in high school. Girls tended to wet their panties if he spoke to them, but I found him thick as a brick. Not sure why anyone would ask him anything, except whether this or that girl was a "go'er".

Ah, high school. Lest we forget.

If only I could. :blushing:
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes Evo and Astronuc
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #3,392
Oops. I was distracted by the Mockford memory. Anyway,...

TIL,... the meaning of Ugga Dugga (thank you @jack action).

At last I understand the meaning of certain control squiggles on my impact screw driver: 1 ugga dugga for cedar (rubbish), 2 ugga duggas is usually sufficient for interior work with soft-ish wood. 3 ugga duggas for typical hardwood work outside. 4 ugga duggas if you're trying to drive a 14g batten screw into 100-yr-old recycled eucalypt (even with a pilot hole).

For your typical physics crackpot: even 100 ugga duggas would not suffice. :headbang:
 
  • Like
Likes Evo, jack action, Tom.G and 1 other person
  • #3,393
Missing_Square_Animation.gif
 
  • Like
Likes atyy, Swamp Thing, Lnewqban and 1 other person
  • #3,395
Ibix said:
Today you learned that ##8/3\neq 5/2##?

Bingo, that's the key to it 😜

1600524769140.png
 
  • Like
Likes Keith_McClary
  • #3,396
Today I Learned this exists:
Screen Shot 2020-09-21 at 1.45.26 PM.png

Might be a surprise for anyone on the porch.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes atyy, DaveE, Evo and 1 other person
  • #3,397
Or porch pirates! :wink:
 
  • Love
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes Tom.G, Keith_McClary and BillTre
  • #3,399
Our days. Rotation periods are very difficult to measure and astronomers wouldn't write days then.
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Likes Keith_McClary and hilbert2
  • #3,400
mfb said:
Our days. Rotation periods are very difficult to measure and astronomers wouldn't write days then.

Yeah, I understood that it's almost certainly Earth days. And a planet orbiting a star that close to it is usually tidally locked, as far as I know (not being a specialist in this).
 
  • #3,401
Another weird 2020 thing:
Today I learned 2020 now has a Zombie Tropical Storm.
Screen Shot 2020-09-22 at 3.58.51 PM.png


Zombie tropical storms are when a tropical storm becomes weak, drops out of thee tropical storm category due to its loss of strength, but then gets stronger and becomes a tropical storm again.

Screen Shot 2020-09-22 at 3.59.14 PM.png
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes Evo and berkeman
  • #3,402
Today I learned that vanilla is an orchid -- the only edible orchid, actually.
 
  • #3,403
hilbert2 said:
https://phys.org/news/2020-09-astronomers-earth-sized-pi-planet-day.html

But is it 3.14 Earth days or 3.14 times its own day? If the latter, then any alien intelligent being would notice this curious fact, too.
mfb said:
Our days. Rotation periods are very difficult to measure and astronomers wouldn't write days then.
hilbert2 said:
Yeah, I understood that it's almost certainly Earth days. And a planet orbiting a star that close to it is usually tidally locked, as far as I know (not being a specialist in this).
We can do the math to see if it's at least in the ballpark! :smile:

The key sentences are:

It orbits a cool, low-mass star that is about one-fifth the size of the sun. The planet circles its star every 3.14 days, at a blistering 81 kilometers per second, or about 181,000 miles per hour.

That all the info one needs to calculate the period. The following equations could prove useful:

Centripetal force equals gravitational force (assuming a circular orbit):

\frac{v^2}{r} = G \frac{M}{r^2}

We're not given what r is. But we're not looking for r, we're looking for the period T. And we know

v = \frac{2 \pi r}{T}

Solve for T. According to my calculations, if M is just a bit lighter than \frac{1}{5} the mass of the Sun, the period is at least somewhere in the ballpark of the claimed 3.14 Earth days.
 
  • #3,404
Found something to compare this to:

The exoplanet Gliese 581b has a mass of 15.8 times Earth and its orbital period is about 5.4 Earth days. The orbit radius is 0.041 AU, much less than even that of Mercury. The next closest planet orbiting that star, Gliese 581c, is said to be almost certainly tidally locked because even it is so close to the star. I'm not sure if the 581b is a gas planet and whether that prevents tidal locking, but otherwise it should be tuned to rotate in that way too.
 
  • #3,405
TIL
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes collinsmark and Swamp Thing
  • #3,406
I didn't learn it today, but I never saw the connection until today:

In English, if you don't care about something you can say you don't give a sh*t.
In German, if you don't care about something you can say "Scheiss drauf", which translates literally to "sh*t on it".

Same meaning, completely opposite phrase.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes Evo, russ_watters and strangerep
  • #3,407
  • #3,408
Tom.G said:
TIL a new word, "abseiling."
Used by @Astronuc in post:
https://www.physicsforums.com/posts/6400047/

Google says; British: ... descending a rock face or other near-vertical surface by using a doubled rope coiled round the body and fixed at a higher point.
It was new to me too, since I don't rappel or rope climb very often. The word is derived from German verb abseilen, to rope down, or lower by rope, or rappel. One can also use 'sich abseilen'.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abseiling
 
  • #3,409
Astronuc said:
It was new to me too, since I don't rappel or rope climb very often. The word is derived from German verb abseilen, to rope down, or lower by rope, or rappel. One can also use 'sich abseilen'.
TIL a new word "rappel". It means "abseil".

Strange how some words don't travel. "Abseil" is well-known (to the general public) in the UK, but "rappel" isn't.
 
  • Informative
Likes Keith_McClary
  • #3,410
DrGreg said:
TIL a new word "rappel". It means "abseil".

Strange how some words don't travel. "Abseil" is well-known (to the general public) in the UK, but "rappel" isn't.
When I saw the word, I figured that it must have German origin. Rappel has a French origin.

https://www.etymonline.com/word/rappel
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_rappel

I was also surprised by the note on the Wikipedia page about Abseiling: "This article may lend undue weight to certain ideas, incidents, or controversies." Seriously?!

I would have thought Aussie rappelling, or abseiling, would be doing it upside down. :oldbiggrin:
 
  • Haha
Likes Keith_McClary
  • #3,411
Tom.G said:
TIL a new word, "abseiling."
Used by @Astronuc in post:
https://www.physicsforums.com/posts/6400047/

Google says; British: ... descending a rock face or other near-vertical surface by using a doubled rope coiled round the body and fixed at a higher point.
The German word is "abseilen". ab for down and seil for rope. We also use it if we want to leave a place secretly, e.g. leaving a party or meeting early, in which case it is used reflexive: sich abseilen = to abseil oneself.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes Keith_McClary and Astronuc
  • #3,412
Astronuc said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_rappel

I would have thought Aussie rappelling, or abseiling, would be doing it upside down. :oldbiggrin:
I've just read the Wikipedia article, and they do do it upside down, i.e. facing downwards and away from the rock face or building, the opposite of what I understood as "abseiling".
 
  • #3,413
fresh_42 said:
We also use it if we want to leave a place secretly, e.g. leaving a party or meeting early, in which case it is used reflexive: sich abseilen = to abseil oneself.
As opposed to "sich aufseilen" = to pull oneself up by rope?
 
  • #3,414
Astronuc said:
As opposed to "sich aufseilen" = to pull oneself up by rope?
Never heard before, but it's in the dictionary.
 
  • #3,415
Astronuc said:
I was also surprised by the note on the Wikipedia page about Abseiling: "This article may lend undue weight to certain ideas, incidents, or controversies." Seriously?!
Here is the explanation. The user who added that template argues that rappelling is more widely used and should be preferred.

I never heard "aufseilen" before either.
 
  • #3,416
mfb said:
I never heard "aufseilen" before either.
I suppose neither of us knows some of these guys:
520x874.jpg
 
  • #3,417
BillTre said:
Some cichlids eat the scales off of other cichlids as a major nutritional component. They have a handedness to their mouth so they specialize in eating scales from one side of their prey.
Today I learned that there are asymmetric fish that specialise in eating from one side of their prey. :wideeyed:
 
  • #3,418
Here's another weird one: Anableps

They are asymmetrical in their sexual organs: they are live bearers (don't lay eggs, give birth to little fish) and therefore require internal fertilization.
The male has a specialized fin which acts like a penis to transfer sperm, as required for internal fertilization.
In Anableps, their body geometry (presumably, their more round in cross section then many other live bearers) drives the specialization of mating from one side or the other, but not both.

Additionally, they are known as "four eye fish" because each of their two eyes are divided horizontally.
Each different properties; one for looking under water (like normal fish), one for looking through the air from their poked out of the water position, for threats from above.
These fish live in shallow brackish water shores, like beaches/mudflats.
They are prey for birds flying over, so they have to aware of them --> in order to, through intentional movement, avoid predation.
They seem to be constantly in rapid motion.
Screen Shot 2020-10-07 at 11.52.47 PM.png


Screen Shot 2020-10-07 at 11.51.15 PM.png


They will go under water, but prefer to be at the top with their eyes poking out.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes strangerep, epenguin and atyy

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 161 ·
6
Replies
161
Views
14K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
35
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
464
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K