Swamp Thing
- 1,028
- 765
BillTre said:
".... .... .... ...."
"Live in the moment? Right, gotcha.... ....... OK, one moment lived in. Anything else?"
Last edited:
BillTre said:
Ah, that explains this news story from yesterday:kyphysics said:Nearly 1/3 of Gen-Zers have stolen using self-checkout kiosks.
that's the Employee Discountkyphysics said:Nearly 1/3 of Gen-Zers have stolen using self-checkout kiosks.
Swamp Thing said:TIL that the Ket people of Siberia use panes of sheet ice in the windows of their traditional winter tents.
Hornbein said:But what did the Ket use for bras?
berkeman said:Ah, that explains this news story from yesterday:
One Third of Gen-Zers Received Coal This Christmas
SURE you did!collinsmark said:[Oops. 'Thought this was the jokes when posting. I may have misposted.]
You can always screenshot, paste in word then, select, format, crop.symbolipoint said:T.I.L., or it was really about three days ago;
How to use a image viewer to resize or crop an image. The trouble is I will probably forget how and later will need to relearn this all over again.
Apologies! Video is a whole different ball game!symbolipoint said:@pinball1970, about response post #5663 --
I was practicing video editing, ????????? making the goals a little different from what your posted video shows. Yet, the posted video is interesting and could be helpful in the future, OR to other readers now.
(excuse the wildcards)
Not a problem. No Apology Needed!pinball1970 said:Apologies! Video is a whole different ball game!
In my defense you said image not video sir.symbolipoint said:@pinball1970, about response post #5663 --
I was practicing video editing, ????????? making the goals a little different from what your posted video shows. Yet, the posted video is interesting and could be helpful in the future, OR to other readers now.
(excuse the wildcards)
Okay still not a problem. We can put still-images into videos. Two-or-three days ago I Learned to ...., and it was something upon manipulating something about an still-image; which I soon included into a video edit. Video editors allow (or at least the ones I am aware of) to put both still-images and video recordings into the video project being built.pinball1970 said:In my defense you said image not video sir.
symbolipoint said:use a image viewer to resize or crop an image.
If I'm being honest, I didn't know you were even talking about digital images...symbolipoint said:I was practicing video editing, ?
There's an article in today's Guardian where James Hansen, one of the scientists who first raised the issue of greenhouse gas emissions in the 1980s, is calling BS on the emissions pledges and the current narrative on climate change. His view is that FAPP we have already hit 1.5C above the pre-industrial average.BillTre said:TIL that 2023 was a hot year.
Interesting read.A typical one-liter (33-ounce) bottle of water contains some 240,000 plastic fragments on average, according to a new study. Many of those fragments have historically gone undetected, the researchers determined, suggesting that health concerns linked to plastic pollution may be dramatically underestimated.
The peer-reviewed study, published Monday in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, is the first to evaluate bottled water for the presence of “nanoplastics” — plastic particles under 1 micrometer in length, or one-seventieth the width of a human hair. The findings show that bottled water could contain up to 100 times more plastic particles than previously estimated, as earlier studies only accounted for microplastics, or pieces between 1 and 5,000 micrometers.
Nanoplastics pose a greater threat to human health than microplastics because they’re small enough to penetrate human cells, enter the bloodstream and impact organs. Nanoplastics can also pass through the placenta to the bodies of unborn babies. Scientists have long suspected their presence in bottled water, but lacked the technology to identify individual nanoparticles.
https://www.kob.com/new-mexico/albuquerque-doctor-accused-of-shoplifting-repeatedly-from-target/kyphysics said:https://www.cbsnews.com/news/one-in-three-gen-zers-has-stolen-from-self-checkout-poll-shows/
https://apnews.com/article/selfcheckout-theft-labor-walmart-target-1a8a6da0291651815557316964d7f8f9
Nearly 1/3 of Gen-Zers have stolen using self-checkout kiosks.
Self-checkout lanes are getting trimmed due to increased theft, but cannot be entirely done away with, due to their popularity and shortage of labor.
I'm better understanding why my self-checkout lanes are sooooooo long lately (while cashier lanes are shorter and constantly inviting people over) and why security/staff hawk the self-checkout lanes.
She's a dentist, so that explains it.kyphysics said:Doctor making ~$300,000/year arrested for repeatedly shoplifting at Target.
Hornbein said:TIL that President Putin works out for two hours every day. Huh. I'm gonna have to start doing that. It's a matter of national pride.
Australian police probably expected a gruesome scene when they checked on a 69-year-old man suspected to have been dead for days. But when they opened the door to his home, they didn’t expect the approximately 30 cats that came flooding out. Inside, they found the man’s body on the floor, with his face gnawed down to the skull and his heart and lungs gone. As if to dispel any doubt about what happened, one cat was still sitting inside the man’s emptied chest cavity.
Previous studies have revealed some differences between canine and feline scavenging. Dogs tend to eat the face and throats of humans, then break the ribs and chew on bones. Cats, on the other hand, often strip skin from the nose, upper lip, and fingers (the same places, Rando notes, that they nip at when playing with a living owner). Scavenging is more common with dogs than cats, Byard adds, “but I don’t trust either of them.”
even a hamster, which made a nest with pieces of its owner’s facial skin.
Still, some pet owners might take comfort in knowing that their bodies could help their lonely, hungry animals. “If it kept my old golden retriever going after I died,” Byard says, “I’d be quite happy for it to have a feed.”
"quintillionth of a gram, or more precisely 10-20g." That's ten sextillionths. A quintillionth is 10-18. Phooey on phys.org.pinball1970 said:This is not in the Quantum sub forum as yet so I will put it here. T.I.L
https://phys.org/news/2024-01-quantum-nature-large-masses.html
The paper https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.030202
From memory was the limit Feynman mentioned in general public lectures, “Buckyballs”
https://www.livescience.com/19268-quantum-double-slit-experiment-largest-molecules.html
They say "quantumness" too, I don't think that's a thing. Overall though?Hornbein said:"quintillionth of a gram, or more precisely 10-20g." That's ten sextillionths. A quintillionth is 10-18. Phooey on phys.org.
Subtract three from 18 to get fifteen, divide that by three to get five. Quint.
Quite interesting. It's clever piggybacking on LIGO like that. It's going to be a very delicate measurement. I guess they are going to average over a great many measurements. How rapidly do those mirrors vibrate?pinball1970 said:They say "quantumness" too, I don't think that's a thing. Overall though?
And next week, we will discuss the different numerical prefixes according to global location.Hornbein said:"quintillionth of a gram, or more precisely 10-20g." That's ten sextillionths. A quintillionth is 10-18. Phooey on phys.org.
Subtract three from 18 to get fifteen, divide that by three to get five. Quint.
In the UK 10-20th would be ten thousand quadrillionths?fresh_42 said:And next week, we will discuss the different numerical prefixes according to global location.
I don't know. We have millions, milliards, billions, billiards etc.Hornbein said:In the UK 10-20th would be ten thousand quadrillionths?
Wikipedia has an article Long and short scales about this.Hornbein said:In the UK 10-20th would be ten thousand quadrillionths?
Really? What's a trillion then?DrGreg said:(billion = a million million)
No, a billion. A trillion would be ##10^{18}.##berkeman said:Really? What's a trillion then?
The advantage of the long scale is that a million times a million is a billion [1+1=2] and so forth. It's logarithmically correct.DrGreg said:Wikipedia has an article Long and short scales about this.
Whereas the US has almost always used the short scale (billion = a thousand million), the UK traditionally used to use long scale (billion = a million million). But since 1974, the UK officially adopted short scale (though occasionally you may find examples of long scale). Long scale is still used in most of Europe, and some other parts of the world.
fresh_42 said:No, a billion. A trillion would be ##10^{18}.
A billion times a billion is not a trillion in either scale. Your logic breaks down immediately after your example.Hornbein said:The advantage of the long scale is that a million times a million is a billion [1+1=2] and so forth. It's logarithmically correct.
Two plus two is four, not three, and a billion times a billion is a quadrillion in the long scale.fresh_42 said:A billion times a billion is not a trillion in either scale. Your logic breaks down immediately after your example.