Topological Phase: Definition & Examples

  • Thread starter Thread starter complement
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Phase Topological
complement
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hi there!

Can anybody tell me, if generically any system, which is solely described by a topological field theory, resides in a topological phase? I can't find any clear notion of topological phase. Only topological phase of matter, but I mean any kind of system.

Thanks for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Levin gives a definition in this talk. He defines a topological phase as being gapped, having a ground state degeneracy that depends only on the topology of the manifold that the system is placed on, and has fractional statistics.

Similar definitions are given by Nayak et al (section III.A) and Hansson et al (section B of the introduction).

Moore's notes contain a different definition of topological phase ('Thouless phases'), which he distinguishes from the definition of topological phase ('Wen-type phases') used by Levin, Nayak and Hansson.
 
Last edited:
atyy said:
Levin gives a definition in this talk. He defines a topological phase as being gapped, having a ground state degeneracy that depends only on the topology of the manifold that the system is placed on, and has fractional statistics.

Similar definitions are given by Nayak et al (section III.A) and Hansson et al (section B of the introduction).

Moore's notes contain a different definition of topological phase ('Thouless phases'), which he distinguishes from the definition of topological phase ('Wen-type phases') used by Levin, Nayak and Hansson.


Very interesting. Do you know some references explaining the derivation of the CS Lagrangian (e.g. wenphases.pdf, page 1, (5))?
 
At what level would you like the explanation?
 
full scale please :)
 
Physics Monkey said:
At what level would you like the explanation?

Well, what can I say? The level of an amateur with a relatively good mathematical background. I was wondering about the formalism of that Lagrangian and interested by the fact that it is interpreted as a "topological one". I know that CS theories are developped in spaces with an odd number of dimensions (N = 3, 5...). Is there also in the published literature a derivation of a similar expression for spaces with an even number of dimensions (e.g. N = 4)?
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Back
Top