TOPOLOGY: homeomorphism between quotient spaces

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on demonstrating the homeomorphism between the spaces \(\mathbb{R}^2\), \(\mathbb{R}^2/I\), and \(\mathbb{R}^2/D^2\). The theorem states that a surjective, continuous map \(f:X\rightarrow Y\) is sufficient to establish that \(X/S(f) \approx Y\). The user successfully shows that \(\mathbb{R}^2/D^2\) is homeomorphic to \(\mathbb{R}^2\) through a specific mapping. However, they seek clarification on the notation \(\mathbb{R}^2/I\) and its implications for constructing a homeomorphism, ultimately concluding that definition (2) is the correct interpretation for their problem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quotient spaces in topology
  • Familiarity with continuous functions and surjective mappings
  • Knowledge of contractible spaces and their properties
  • Basic concepts of homeomorphism in topology
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of quotient spaces in topology
  • Study the concept of contractible spaces and their implications
  • Learn about continuous mappings and their role in establishing homeomorphisms
  • Explore examples of homeomorphisms between different topological spaces
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in topology, students studying advanced mathematical concepts, and anyone interested in understanding homeomorphisms and quotient spaces.

jjou
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
Show the following spaces are homeomorphic: \mathbb{R}^2, \mathbb{R}^2/I, \mathbb{R}^2/D^2.

Note: D^2 is the closed ball of radius 1 centered at the origin. I is the closed interval [0,1] in \mathbb{R}.

THEOREM:
It is enough to find a surjective, continuous map f:X\rightarrow Y to show that X/S(f)\approx Y.

I can easily show R^2/D^2 \approx R^2 by sending every point in D^2 to the origin and, for every point outside D^2, letting f(r,\theta)=(r-1,\theta).

I am having difficulty showing that \mathbb{R}^2/I is homeomorphic to either \mathbb{R}^2 or \mathbb{R}^2/D^2. First, I do not understand the notation \mathbb{R}^2/I since I is traditionally a subset of R, not R^2. Does \mathbb{R}^2/I mean:

(1) points on the x-axis are equivalent iff the x coordinate falls in [0,1] and all other points (any point x,y where y=/=0) are not equivalent, OR
(2) (x,y)~(w,z) iff y=z and x,w\in[0,1], OR
(3) (x,y)~(w,z) iff x,w\in[0,1] regardless of y and z?

If it means (2), then I simply take f so that f(x,y)=(0,y) for x in [0,1], f(x,y)=(x-1,y) for x>1 and f(x,y)=(x,y) for x<0.

If it is (1), I can find a surjective (but not continous!) map f that takes [0,1]x{0} to (0,0), (x,0) to (x-1,0) for x>1, and leaves all other points where they are.

For (3), I can find a continuous surjective map from R^2 to R^2/I where f(x,y)=(x,y) for x\leq0 and f(x,y)=(x+1,y) for x>0.

Can someone clarify what \mathbb{R}^2/I means? If it means (1), any hints?

Thanks. :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Asked a friend - I think, we're using definition (2) for the problem, in which case I've got a solution.

Thanks. :)
 
Sorry if this is too late for your needs.

A general result that will help you here is that if A is contractible in X, then

X/A is homeo to X , which kind of makes sense, since you may consider A as

a single point in X, and then X/{pt.} is a trivial quotient. In this case, D^2 is

contractible in R^2 , and I is ( I am.?) also contractible, both in R, and in R^2.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K