Topology Question:Connected Components

  • Thread starter jimisrv
  • Start date
  • #1
7
0
Hi,

I have a conceptual question.

In a project I am working on, we are dealing with [tex]\Re[/tex][tex]^{n}[/tex] (with the usual topology), and I am working on characterizing some objects. In particular, I am dealing with the intersection of two simply connected open sets (that do not have any sort of pathological nature). I am identifying this intersection as the union of connected components.

My advisor asked me about the notion of connected components and why we care, since the intersection of open sets should always consist of connected components...I didn't have a good answer, and upon looking in Munkres, I don't have any better idea.

So, why do we consider connected components? It seems that every set is the union of connected components? I assume this notion would be more useful in the general setting rather than[tex]\Re[/tex][tex]^{n}[/tex] with < | >[tex]_{2}[/tex]?

I am studying engineering so please forgive my mathematical immaturity.

Thanks,
Mike
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
mathwonk
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
2020 Award
11,125
1,323
here is one application of the concept: a function whose derivative is everywhere zero, is constant on connected components, but not necessarily constant everywhere.
 

Related Threads on Topology Question:Connected Components

  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
Top