Torque, angular acceleration, and moment of inertia

AI Thread Summary
Two identical dumbbells are analyzed for their angular accelerations when the same torque is applied, with one rotating around its center and the other a quarter along the rod. The moment of inertia for dumbbell A is calculated as 8mR², while for dumbbell B it is 10mR². Since the torque is constant, the relationship t = Iα indicates that the angular acceleration for dumbbell A will be greater than that of dumbbell B due to its lower moment of inertia. The confusion arose from misinterpreting the relationship between moment of inertia and angular acceleration. The discussion clarifies that a larger moment of inertia results in a smaller angular acceleration when the same torque is applied.
chromium1387
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We did this question today in class, but looking back at it, I'm kind of confused.

Two identical dumbbells are formed by placing equal point masses at either end of two identical light (ie. massless) rods. The rods are pivoted so that dumbbell A rotates around the centre of the rod, while dumbbell B rotates around a point a quarter of the way along the rod. If the same torque is applied to both rods, how will the resulting angular accelerations compare?

Homework Equations



t=Iα

The Attempt at a Solution


Okay, so we calculated the moment of inertia for each dumbbell by saying that each was 4R long. So, IA=m(2R)2+m(2R)2=8mR2 and IB=m(R)2+m(3R)2=10mR2. Because B has a larger moment of inertia, does it not need a greater angular acceleration than A if the same torque is applied? :S
 
Physics news on Phys.org
chromium1387 said:
t=Iα

IA=8mR2 and IB=10mR2. Because B has a larger moment of inertia, does it not need a greater angular acceleration than A if the same torque is applied? :S

Look at the first equation: t(torque)=I(moment of inertia) * α(angular acceleration)
t is the same for both dumbbells : IAαA=IBαB

Substitute for the I-s. Which angular acceleration is greater?

ehild
 
oh, wow. i was definitely thinking backwards for some reason. thank you for replying to my very silly question!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top