I Torque without a torque wrench

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter HRG
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torque Wrench
AI Thread Summary
To achieve 250 ft lbs of torque without a torque wrench, one can use the formula Torque = Force x Distance, which allows a person to calculate the necessary distance to apply their weight on a breaker bar. A person weighing 142.3 lbs would need to stand 21 inches from the nut to exert the required torque. While the calculations are correct, practicing the technique is crucial to avoid accidents, and safety measures should be taken, such as using a platform under the wrench. Experts recommend investing in a proper torque wrench for frequent use, as it ensures safety and accuracy. Overall, while alternative methods exist, they carry risks that should be carefully considered.
HRG
Messages
32
Reaction score
8
I need to tighten the nut for a trailer hitch ball to 250 ft lbs but I don't have a torque wrench that can do it.

I read on a different forum that an alternate old school method to get 450 ft lbs of torque is:
  • Torque = Force x Distance
  • So in that forum's example, have a 180 lb person stand on a 2.5 ft breaker bar. The calculation is 180 x 2.5 = 450.
Is that a correct way to get 450 ft lbs of torque?

If so, then since I weigh 142.3 lbs, 250 ft lbs / 142.3 lbs = 1.76 ft.
0.76 ft is about 9 inches. Therefore 12" + 9" = 21".
So I would have to stand on a breaker bar at 21" from the nut to exert 250 ft lbs of torque.
The breaker bar would of course have to be horizontal while I stand on it for the 250 ft lbs of torque.

Need confirmation from physics gurus whether this is correct or not.
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your math is correct. I would practice my technique before standing on the breaker bar with the nut attached.
You don't want to bounce the bar or have your weight shifting +/- an inch along the bar.
Plan and Practice.
 
Yes, it's right. Plus what @.Scott said. And you get a +1 for actually properly tightening the hitch ball.

I once designed a threaded connection that needed 3000 ft-lbs of torque. So we bolted a 15 foot length of pipe to the part, attached a deer scale, tied a rope to the deer scale, and had two men pull on the rope until the scale read 200 lbs.

A deer scale is a spring scale used by deer hunters for weighing deer. Like this, but 300 lbs full scale:
Deer scale.jpg
 
We need to close this thread now, since there is liability involved in helping you do something dangerous to save a few bucks. Especially if you are going to be changing trailer balls very often, you should just invest in a new torque wrench. Also, you may want to invest in an extension for that wrench so you can get the nut back off again... :wink:

As a safety tip, since you will likely be turning the hitch 90 degrees in order to be able to use your weight vertically to turn the nut, also put a box or other platform under the part of the wrench where you will be applying your weight, so if you do slip off, you only slip a couple inches onto the box/platform.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
33
Views
80K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Back
Top