Total energy levels of the electron and rest energy

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The total relativistic energy of electrons in an atom is defined by the Dirac equation, which accounts for both binding energy and rest energy. In heavy elements (Z>90), the total energy of electrons is typically lower than their rest energy due to relativistic effects, although certain interactions, such as the Darwin term, can increase energy. The absorption of photons by electrons invariably increases their energy and velocity, while phenomena like Rayleigh scattering can occur without changing energy levels. Understanding these principles is crucial for comprehending electron dynamics in high-Z elements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Dirac equation
  • Familiarity with relativistic mass and energy concepts
  • Knowledge of binding energy in atomic physics
  • Basic principles of photon interactions with matter
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Dirac equation and its implications in quantum mechanics
  • Study relativistic mass and energy relationships in particle physics
  • Explore the concept of binding energy in heavy elements
  • Investigate photon interactions, including Rayleigh scattering and its effects
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and anyone interested in atomic energy levels and relativistic effects in high-Z elements.

relativityfan
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
hi,

the following question is extremely important so please reply!

in an atom, the energy levels of the electrons are negative and the velocity of the electron increases when the energy decreases.

however, this cannot be the total energy(in relativity) because it does not includes the rest energy of the electron
what I really don't know is the formula for the total (relativistic) energy of the electrons. With the binding energy, the mass of the electron decreases(mass deficit) but its speed increases, therefore its relativistic mass too...

For example, in heavy elements (for example Z>90), the velocity of electrons is relativistic. In such case, should the total energy of the elecrons (binding energy) be higher or lower than the rest energy?

and I suppose that such energy can be reached by absorbing photons.
in an particle accelerators, I suppose that the relativistic mass is increased by absorbing photons.
I also suppose that the only photons absorption and emission of photons by electrons drops from an energy level to another energy level. (where are the virtual photons?)

Am I correct with thiese sentences?

so why in some case absorbing photons increases the velocity and in other cases it decreases the velocity?

Please reply, any help for one of these questions is very welcome!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
relativityfan said:
however, this cannot be the total energy(in relativity) because it does not includes the rest energy of the electron

Well that's mostly just a shift of m_0c^2.
what I really don't know is the formula for the total (relativistic) energy of the electrons.

That'd be the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac_equation" (if you ignore QED effects)
For example, in heavy elements (for example Z>90), the velocity of electrons is relativistic. In such case, should the total energy of the elecrons (binding energy) be higher or lower than the rest energy

The total energy is usually lower and the binding energy higher. Both for relativistic effects overall, and for the mass-velocity correction specifically. However, some relativistic effects raise the energy (e.g. the Darwin term), but these are obviously smaller.
I also suppose that the only photons absorption and emission of photons by electrons drops from an energy level to another energy level. (where are the virtual photons?)

No, there are atom-photon interactions which leave the energy level unchanged; Rayleigh scattering for instance.
so why in some case absorbing photons increases the velocity and in other cases it decreases the velocity?

Huh? The absorption of a photon by an electron can only increase its energy and velocity.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K