Hello folks,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I've got a bit of a problem with estimating the overall error in measurement of a function which I have sampled at sixteen independent points and have calculated the associated error bar with each point. The problem is I'm not sure how to combine all the sixteen errors into a single average error for all my measurements in one go.

At the moment I am simply using this method: √(1/[itex]\sum[/itex](1/weights)) where the weights are 1/[itex]\sigma[/itex]^2. The problem is this is not giving me a value for the total standard deviation that I expect therefore I do not trust it but is this the correct method? Are there any others?

It might be important to point out that the errors on f(x) vary as approximately as x^2 + C, e.g. they are large when approaching 0 and large when x is large. Therefore I needed to use weighted methods to estimate the total standard deviation as an unweighted average will change depending on the range of x I sample over, e.g. the error goes to infinity if I average over infinity.

Thanks for any help physics forum!

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Total standard deviation of a measured function.

Loading...

Similar Threads - Total standard deviation | Date |
---|---|

About the strategy of reducing the total suffering in a queue | Dec 28, 2017 |

A Combining separate upper & lower limits into a total? | Dec 8, 2016 |

Total distribution when measuring | Nov 21, 2015 |

Total number of different combination | May 21, 2014 |

Calculation of total standard deviation over samples of different size | Oct 31, 2008 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**