Transfer function with initial conditions (DE)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on deriving a transfer function from the differential equation y''(t) + y'(t) + y(t) + C = u(t), where C represents a constant and u(t) is the input. The user expresses confusion regarding the presence of the term C/s after applying the Laplace transform, which complicates isolating Y(s)/U(s). It is clarified that for transfer function analysis, initial conditions (ICs) are typically set to zero, allowing for a focus on the driven response of the system. The conversation emphasizes the distinction between transient and driven responses in linear systems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential equations, specifically second-order linear equations.
  • Familiarity with Laplace transforms and their application in control theory.
  • Knowledge of transfer functions and their significance in system analysis.
  • Concept of initial conditions and their role in system responses.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of transfer functions from differential equations using the Laplace transform.
  • Learn about the implications of initial conditions in linear system analysis.
  • Explore transient response versus steady-state response in control systems.
  • Examine examples of transfer functions with constant inputs and their applications in engineering.
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, control system designers, and students of applied mathematics seeking to deepen their understanding of transfer functions and system dynamics.

MechEEE
Messages
5
Reaction score
2
I have a differential equation of the form y''(t)+y'(t)+y(t)+C = 0. I think this implies that there are non-zero initial conditions. Is it possible to write a transfer function for this system?
This post:
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/transfer-function-with-non-zero-initial-conditions.852028/
sort of helps me, but I still need more help. How to actually use this method to write a transfer function? I don't see how to continue with the suggested substitution there, either, if that is part of the strategy. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF. Is this question for your schoolwork?
 
No, not for schoolwork. I'm getting ahead at my workplace and trying some self-learning.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Okay, but even self-study questions go in our schoowork forums. I'll move your thread there now. You will get good help as long as you show good efforts.

I'm curious -- why do you say that the form of that differential equation suggests non-zero initial conditions?
 
berkeman said:
Okay, but even self-study questions go in our schoowork forums. I'll move your thread there now. You will get good help as long as you show good efforts.

I'm curious -- why do you say that the form of that differential equation suggests non-zero initial conditions?
I think because it can be re-written as y''(t)+y'(t)+y(t)+y(0) = 0, where y(0) evaluates to nonzero.
 
MechEEE said:
I have a differential equation of the form y''(t)+y'(t)+y(t)+C = 0. I think this implies that there are non-zero initial conditions.
If y(t) and it's derivatives were all 0 at t=0, you would be left with C=0. So, yes, I think the initial conditions are y''(0)+y'(0)+y(0) = -C.

MechEEE said:
Is it possible to write a transfer function for this system?
As I understand it transfer functions have an output divided by an input. So you could certainly take the laplace transform but what is the input in your case? This looks more like a transient response problem to me.
 
Yes, I see. I think I did intend to put an input in there. So let me re-formulate my equation as:
y''(t)+y'(t)+y(t)+C = u(t)
where u(t) is an input. If I take the laplace of both sides I get
s2Y(s)+sY(s)+Y(s)+(C/s) = U(s).
But now I have a term on the left side that doesn't have Y(s) in it, so I don't know how to solve for Y(s)/U(s) to get the transfer function. In all the examples I've seen, you can factor out a common Y(s) from the entire LHS to solve for Y(s)/U(s). Here I'm not sure what to with the C/s term that results from taking the laplace of that constant.
 
MechEEE said:
Yes, I see. I think I did intend to put an input in there. So let me re-formulate my equation as:
y''(t)+y'(t)+y(t)+C = u(t)
where u(t) is an input. If I take the laplace of both sides I get
s2Y(s)+sY(s)+Y(s)+(C/s) = U(s).
But now I have a term on the left side that doesn't have Y(s) in it, so I don't know how to solve for Y(s)/U(s) to get the transfer function. In all the examples I've seen, you can factor out a common Y(s) from the entire LHS to solve for Y(s)/U(s). Here I'm not sure what to with the C/s term that results from taking the laplace of that constant.
Ignore it. We set the ICs to zero for the transfer function. So you would normally think of a linear system as having a two part response; the transient response with ICs but no driving function, plus the driven response, with no ICs. In linear systems they don't affect each other.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MechEEE
Thank you, DaveE.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DaveE

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
976
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K