Transforming Complex Solutions into Polar Form

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
8 replies · 2K views
w3390
Messages
341
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that the solution x(t) = Ge^(iwt), where G is in general complex, can be written in the form x(t) = Dcos(wt - [tex]\delta[/tex]).

D(w) and [tex]\delta[/tex](w) are real functions of w.

Homework Equations



z = Ae^(i[tex]\phi[/tex])

The Attempt at a Solution



So I know I should start by writing G in polar form. I am confused though as to how to go to polar form with just the G. Is it simply just Ge^(i[tex]\phi[/tex]). Then, I could use Euler's formula to write:

Ge^(i[tex]\phi[/tex]) = Gcos([tex]\phi[/tex]) + iGsin([tex]\phi[/tex]).

I am not sure where this gets me. Any help on where to go from here or if this is even correct would be much appreciated.
 
on Phys.org
hi w3390! :smile:

(have a delta: δ and a rho: ρ and a phi: φ and an omega: ω :wink:)
w3390 said:

Homework Statement



Show that the solution x(t) = Ge^(iwt), where G is in general complex, can be written in the form x(t) = Dcos(wt - [tex]\delta[/tex]).

D(w) and [tex]\delta[/tex](w) are real functions of w.

but that's obviously not true …

the RHS is real, but x isn't :confused:
 
I am confused then because my question was from a test prep sheet from my professor. Should I perhaps only consider the real part of x(t)?
 
What I'm saying is:

x(t) = Ge^(i[tex]\phi[/tex])

x(t) = G[cos([tex]\omega[/tex]t - [tex]\delta[/tex]) + i*sin([tex]\omega[/tex]t - [tex]\delta[/tex])

Then taking only the real part of this:

x(t) = Gcos([tex]\omega[/tex]t - [tex]\delta[/tex]).

From here, I can compare to the given solution of x(t) = Dcos([tex]\omega[/tex]t - [tex]\delta[/tex]) and say that G = D.

Does this make sense?
 
Hi w3390! :smile:

(what happened to that δ φ and ω i gave you? :confused:)

I don't understand where your second line came from …

w3390 said:
x(t) = G[cos([tex]\omega[/tex]t - [tex]\delta[/tex]) + i*sin([tex]\omega[/tex]t - [tex]\delta[/tex])