Transition matrix element and Isospin

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between transition matrix elements and isospin in particle interactions, specifically focusing on strong and weak interactions. Participants explore the application of the Wigner-Eckart theorem to various decay processes and the implications for matrix elements in these contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a series of particle interaction processes and questions whether the transition matrix elements depend solely on the isospin value.
  • Another participant cites the Wigner-Eckart theorem, explaining that matrix elements factorize and are influenced by Clebsch-Gordon coefficients, suggesting that the strong Hamiltonian operator can be decomposed into components with definite isospins.
  • A follow-up question is posed regarding the behavior of matrix elements under weak interactions, questioning if they would follow the same principles as those under strong interactions.
  • A participant responds that the Wigner-Eckart theorem applies generally to tensor operators, regardless of the type of interaction, and provides an exercise related to weak decay amplitudes, hinting at an isospin decomposition for the weak Hamiltonian.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the applicability of the Wigner-Eckart theorem to both strong and weak interactions, but there is an ongoing exploration of how these principles manifest in different contexts, particularly regarding the specific behavior of matrix elements.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the applicability of the Wigner-Eckart theorem and the nature of tensor operators, which may not be universally accepted or applicable in all scenarios.

Xico Sim
Messages
43
Reaction score
4
Hi, guys.

A type of problem that often appears is to find the relation between cross sections of some processes. An example would be:

$$\pi _{- }+ p \rightarrow K_0 + \Sigma_0$$
$$\pi _{- }+ p \rightarrow K_+ + \Sigma_-$$
$$\pi _{+}+ p \rightarrow K_+ + \Sigma_+$$

To do this, I argue that

$$\sigma \, \alpha \, \Gamma \, \alpha \, M$$

with ##M## the transition matrix element.

In this case, the interactions are strong. I write the initial and final states for each process in the ##{I,i}## basis and I then write ##M=\langle i | H_s | f \rangle##.

I end up getting, for example for the third process: ##M=\langle 3/2,3/2 | H_s | 3/2, 3/2 \rangle##.
For the first process, I get one term of the form ##\langle 3/2,-1/2 | H_s | 3/2,-1/2 \rangle##.

My question: are there two expressions I just wrote equal? i.e. does ##M=\langle I,i | H_s | I,i' \rangle## depend only on the value of ##I##? Why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. According to the Wigner-Eckart theorem, the matrix elements of a tensor operator \mathcal{H}^{M}_{I}, having isospin I and third component value M, factorize as
\langle I_{2}, m_{2}| \mathcal{H}^{M}_{I}| I_{1},m_{1} \rangle = \langle I_{2},m_{2}| I,M ; I_{1},m_{1}\rangle \langle I_{2}|| \mathcal{H}_{I}|| I_{1}\rangle , where the first factor on the RHS is the Clebsch-Gordon coefficient and the second factor is the reduced matrix element, which is independent of m_{1},m_{2} and M. The processes, you listed, proceed through either I = 3/2 or I = 1/2 channels. So, your strong Hamiltonian operator can be decomposed into two pieces with definite isospins: \mathcal{H}_{s} = \mathcal{H}_{3/2} + \mathcal{H}_{1/2}, and the problem is solved by reading the corresponding C-G cofficients.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Xico Sim
samalkhaiat said:
Yes. According to the Wigner-Eckart theorem, the matrix elements of a tensor operator \mathcal{H}^{M}_{I}, having isospin I and third component value M, factorize as
\langle I_{2}, m_{2}| \mathcal{H}^{M}_{I}| I_{1},m_{1} \rangle = \langle I_{2},m_{2}| I,M ; I_{1},m_{1}\rangle \langle I_{2}|| \mathcal{H}_{I}|| I_{1}\rangle , where the first factor on the RHS is the Clebsch-Gordon coefficient and the second factor is the reduced matrix element, which is independent of m_{1},m_{2} and M. The processes, you listed, proceed through either I = 3/2 or I = 1/2 channels. So, your strong Hamiltonian operator can be decomposed into two pieces with definite isospins: \mathcal{H}_{s} = \mathcal{H}_{3/2} + \mathcal{H}_{1/2}, and the problem is solved by reading the corresponding C-G cofficients.

What if it's the weak interaction? Should't the matrix elements behave the same way?
 
Xico Sim said:
What if it's the weak interaction? Should't the matrix elements behave the same way?

The Wigner-Eckart theorem is a general statement about tensor operators. These tensor operators can (but they don’t have to) describe interactions. And, when the tensor operators do describe interactions, the type of interaction is not relevant. So, when the assumptions of the theorem are satisfied, you can apply it to the strong, weak or electromagnetic interactions.
Okay, here is an exercise for you. Use the Wigner-Eckart theorem to calculate the (non-leptonic) weak decay amplitudes for K^{0} \to \pi^{+}\pi^{-} , \ \ \ \ K^{0} \to \pi^{0}\pi^{0} .
Experimentally, it has been observed that \frac{T \left( K^{0} \to \pi^{+}\pi^{-}\right)}{T \left( K^{0} \to \pi^{0}\pi^{0} \right)} \approx \sqrt{2} . Translate this into relation between amplitudes.
Hint: Ignoring Dirac’s gamma matrices, the low-energy (non-leptonic) weak Hamiltonian can be written as \mathcal{H}^{\Delta S = 1}_{(w)} = \frac{G}{\sqrt{2}}\left( [\bar{u}d][\bar{s}u] + h.c. \right) . The first factor has I = 1, and the second factor has I = 1/2. So, you have the following isospin decomposition \mathcal{H}^{\Delta S = 1}_{(w)} = \mathcal{H}_{1 \otimes \frac{1}{2}} = \mathcal{H}_{\frac{3}{2} \oplus \frac{1}{2}} = \mathcal{H}_{3/2} + \mathcal{H}_{1/2} .
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K