Transitional Equilibrium: Tension

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the tension in a wire supporting a tight-rope walker and a beam. The combined weight of the walker and beam is 882 Newtons, which is supported equally by both sides of the wire. The correct approach involves balancing the forces, leading to the equation 441 N = T sin(5 degrees), resulting in a tension of 5059 N. A common mistake identified was incorrectly doubling the tension calculation instead of dividing the weight between the two sides. Understanding that the tension calculated for one side represents the total tension in the wire is crucial for accurate results.
Cummings
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
A 60 kg tight-rope walker carries a long beam with a mass of 30kg across a 10m long wire. When she is at the centre of the wire (i.e. 5 m across) each section of the wire makes an angle of 5 degrees to the horisontal. Calculate the tension in the wire.

This one is not that difficult but a lack a certain part of me to get the answer.

60+30 = 90 which is the combined weight Multiply this by 9.8 and we get the force the combined weight exerts on the wire. This is 882 Newtons. Now, from trigonometry i got the tension in the wire to be (2 * 882)/sin(5degrees) = 20239 Newtons of tension. This is 4 times the correct answer. So i though that maybe half the weight acts on half the wire to 822/sin(5degrees) might be the answer but it would leave you with double the correct answer. Argh.

I need help on this one :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Each wire supports half of the 90 kg.

The forces acting on one of the wires must be balanced. So, equate the x and y components of the tension T with the gravitational force acting on the tightrope walker (for one wire, 441 N).

It will probably be something like 441 = T sin(5), so solving for T gives T = 5059 N.
 
futz is correct. Why in the world do you have that factor of 2 in
"(2 * 882)/sin(5degrees) "? The total weight is 882 Newtons and, since, each side supports 1/2 of that: you should have divided by 2, not multiplied by 2. That's why your answer is 4 times what it should be.
 
Ok, so my mistake was that i doubled the tension when i shouldn't have, and not divided the weight into halve for the 2 sides.

The main thing i did wrong was not knowing that once you find the tension for the side your working with, you don't double it to get the full tension of the wire.

So the tension on the side we found is the total tension :) if that makes sense to you.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top