Translations math problem (gr 12 level)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Senjai
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 4K views
Senjai
Messages
104
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If the function y=f(x) is transformed to -2y-2=f(0.5x-3), and the point (-3, -2) is on f(x), which of the following will be on the new function -2y-2=f(0.5x-3)?


Homework Equations


[tex]y = {af}\left[b(x-h)\right] + k[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


When i attempted this question, i got (-9, -1) which is wrong, i don't know the answer still. I am still unsure really how to show my work so i pretty much did the horizontal translations and scale factors to x, and vertical translations and scale factors to y.

after rewriting the function, i have [itex]y = -\frac{1}{2}(0.5x-3) + 2[/itex]

in an attempt to show work i showed the transformations.

[itex]x \rightarrow 0.5x[/itex]
[itex]x \rightarrow x - 3[/itex]
[itex]y \rightarrow 2y[/itex]
[itex]y \rightarrow -y{}\textit{(reflection on x axis)}[/itex]
[itex]y \rightarrow y - 2[/itex]

I then simply tried to run those transformations on the x and y values seperatly.
(-3, -2)

x = -3(2) -3 = -9
y = -((-1/2)(-2)) + 2 = 1?? I am lost,

i don't really know how to show my owkrk for this question, nor how to do it properly.
any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This was also a multiple choice question. Possible answers were
(-9, -1)
(1, 0)
(0, 0)
(-12, 2)
 
Senjai said:

Homework Statement


If the function y=f(x) is transformed to -2y-2=f(0.5x-3), and the point (-3, -2) is on f(x), which of the following will be on the new function -2y-2=f(0.5x-3)?
Saying that "(-3, -2) is on f(x)" means that f(-3)= -2. In order that we be able to use that, without any other knowledge of f, we need to be able to apply f to -3 so would have to have 0.5x- 3= -3 so 0.5x= 0 or x= 0. In that case, we have -2y- 2= f(-3)= -2 so -2y= 0 and y= 0. The point is (0, 0).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
wow, i feel really really dumb, makes sense putting it that way.. looked at it on a graph, was able to do it that way, algebraically i wasn't able to see it like that.. so its easy, transformation applied to x = previous x value? i don't understand why you can't sub -3 in for x and use that to transform it though, sorry for being all dumb about it...

~Senjai
 
Senjai said:
(snip)
after rewriting the function, i have [itex]y = -\frac{1}{2}(0.5x-3) + 2[/itex]
That's not right. What happened to the f? If the function [tex]y = f(x)[/tex] is transformed to [tex]{-}2y{-}2 = f(0.5x{-}3)[/tex], then
[tex]y = {-}\frac{1}{2}[f(0.5x{-}3)] {-} 1[/tex].

But you don't need to do this at all; HallsofIvy's solution is the way to go.


01