Transmission coefficient limit

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 1K views
TheCanadian
Messages
361
Reaction score
13
I've attached the equation for the transmission coefficient of a particle going through a potential barrier and E < V. I was simply wondering in the limit V --> E, why does T --> 0 (i.e. the V-E term --> 0 and thus the denominator would approach infinity, making T --> 0)? Shouldn't it be approaching 1?
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2016-03-07 at 12.20.30 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2016-03-07 at 12.20.30 AM.png
    8.1 KB · Views: 496
Physics news on Phys.org
TheCanadian said:
I've attached the equation for the transmission coefficient of a particle going through a potential barrier and E < V. I was simply wondering in the limit V --> E, why does T --> 0 (i.e. the V-E term --> 0 and thus the denominator would approach infinity, making T --> 0)? Shouldn't it be approaching 1?
There is also the ##sinh²(k_1 a)## to take into account, since ##V_0 \rightarrow E## implies ##k_1 \rightarrow 0##.

Purely mathematically, you will get as limit ##1+\frac{mEa²}{2 {\hbar}^2}## in the denominator.
(Physically maybe ##E \rightarrow V_0## makes more sense, so in the limit, replace ##E## by ##V_0##.)
 
Last edited: